The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Double blind, placebo controlled trial of metronidazole in Crohn's disease.
Open accessAbstract
A double blind study compared the efficacy of metronidazole in two doses (20 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg) with placebo in patients with Crohn's disease. One hundred and five patients participated but only 56 completed the 16 week study -21 were withdrawn for deterioration of symptoms, 17 for adverse experiences, and 11 for protocol violation. Significant improvement in disease activity as measured by the Crohn's disease activity index (metronidazole 20 mg/kg, 97 units; metronidazole 10 mg/kg, 67 units; placebo -1 unit, p = 0.002) and serum orosomucoid (metronidazole 20 mg/kg/day, 49; 10 mg/kg/day, 38; placebo, -9, p = 0.001)) were detected. Changes in C reactive protein concentrations did not achieve significance when all three groups were considered but were significant when all metronidazole treated patients were grouped and compared with the placebo treated patients (0.8 v -0.9, p less than 0.05). Although patients receiving metronidazole 20 mg/kg/day had a greater improvement in disease activity than those receiving 10 mg/kg/day (difference 30 units (95% confidence intervals -27-87), the small sample size may have precluded the detection of statistical significance. Preliminary analysis suggests that metronidazole was more effective in patients with disease confined to the large intestine or affecting both small and large bowel than in those with small bowel disease only. There were no differences in remission rates between metronidazole and placebo treated patients. We conclude that metronidazole warrants further assessment in the treatment of patients with active Crohn's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease
Xavier, R. J., & Podolsky, D. K. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06005 · Cited by 4,364
Commensal Host-Bacterial Relationships in the Gut
Hooper, L. V., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058709 · Cited by 2,362
Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies
Baumgart, D. C., & Sandborn, W. J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60751-x · Cited by 1,920
Darfeuille-Michaud, A., Boudeau, J., Bulois, P., Neut, C., Glasser, A.-L., Barnich, N., Bringer, M.-A., Swidsinski, A., Beaugerie, L., & Colombel, J.-F. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.061 · Cited by 1,566
Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults
Carter, M. J., Lobo, A. J., & Travis, S. P. L. (2004) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2004.043372 · Cited by 1,083
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutherland, L., Singleton, J., Sessions, J., Hanauer, S., Krawitt, E., Rankin, G., Summers, R., Mekhjian, H., Greenberger, N., & Kelly, M.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1071-1075
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2136419595
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double blind, placebo controlled trial of metronidazole in Crohn's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.32.9.1071
- The paper
- Sutherland, L., Singleton, J., Sessions, J., Hanauer, S., Krawitt, E., Rankin, G., Summers, R., Mekhjian, H., Greenberger, N., & Kelly, M. (1991). Double blind, placebo controlled trial of metronidazole in Crohn's disease. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.32.9.1071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.