The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Duodenal bacterial overgrowth during treatment in outpatients with omeprazole.
Open accessAbstract
The extent of duodenal bacterial overgrowth during the pronounced inhibition of acid secretion that occurs with omeprazole treatment is unknown. The bacterial content of duodenal juice of patients treated with omeprazole was therefore examined in a controlled prospective study. Duodenal juice was obtained under sterile conditions during diagnostic upper endoscopy. Aspirates were plated quantitatively for anaerobic and aerobic organisms. Twenty five outpatients with peptic ulcer disease were investigated after a 5.7 (0.5) weeks (mean (SEM)) treatment course with 20 mg (nine patients) or 40 mg (16 patients). The control group consisted of 15 outpatients referred for diagnostic endoscopy without prior antisecretory treatment. No patient in the control group had duodenal bacterial overgrowth. In the omeprazole group bacterial overgrowth (> or = 10(5) cfu/ml) was found in 14 (56%) patients (p = 0.0003). The number of bacteria (log10) in duodenal juice in patients treated with omeprazole was distinctly higher (median 5.7; range < 2-8.7) when compared with the control group (median < 2; range < 2-5.0; p = 0.0004). As well as orally derived bacteria, faecal type bacteria were found in seven of 14 and anaerobic bacteria in three of 14 patients. Bacterial overgrowth was similar with the two doses of omeprazole. These results indicate that duodenal bacterial overgrowth of both oral and faecal type bacteria occurs often in ambulatory patients treated with omeprazole. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, particularly in high risk groups during long term treatment with omeprazole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DUMOULIN, G. (1982) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90974-6 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Posserud, I., Stotzer, P.-O., Björnsson, E. S., Abrahamsson, H., & Simrén, M. (2007) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2006.108712 · Cited by 499
Bavishi, C., & DuPont, H. L. (2011) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04874.x · Cited by 480
Ford, A. C., Spiegel, B. M. R., Talley, N. J., & Moayyedi, P. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031 · Cited by 351
Increased Incidence of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth During Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
Lombardo, L., Foti, M., Ruggia, O., & Chiecchio, A. (2010) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.12.022 · Cited by 350
Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Meta-analysis
Lo, W., & Chan, W. W. (2013) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.011 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Fried, M., Siegrist, H., Frei, R., Froehlich, F., Duroux, P., Thorens, J., Blum, A., Bille, J., Gonvers, J. J., & Gyr, K.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-26
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2152698196
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Duodenal bacterial overgrowth during treatment in outpatients with omeprazole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.35.1.23
- The paper
- Fried, M., Siegrist, H., Frei, R., Froehlich, F., Duroux, P., Thorens, J., Blum, A., Bille, J., Gonvers, J. J., & Gyr, K. (1994). Duodenal bacterial overgrowth during treatment in outpatients with omeprazole. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.1.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.