Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial.

Open access
Breuer, R I, Soergel, K H, Lashner, B A, Christ, M L, Hanauer, S B, Vanagunas, A, Harig, J M, Keshavarzian, A, Robinson, M, Sellin, J H, Weinberg, D, Vidican, D E, Flemal, K L, Rademaker, A W·1997·Gut

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) deficiency is associated with colitis in animals and humans, and the mucosal metabolism of these compounds is decreased in ulcerative colitis. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of topical SCFA treatment in ulcerative colitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 103 patients with distal ulcerative colitis were entered into a six week, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of rectal SCFA twice daily; patients who were unchanged on placebo were offered SCFA in an open-label extension trial. RESULTS: Of the 91 patients completing the trial, more patients in the SCFA treated than in the placebo treated group improved (33% v 20%, p = 0.14, NS). Those on SCFA also had larger, but statistically non-significant, reductions in every component of their clinical and histological activity scores. In patients with a relatively short current episode of colitis (< 6 months, n = 42), more responded to SCFA than to placebo (48% v 18%, p = 0.03). These patients also had larger, but statistically non-significant, decreases in their clinical activity index (p = 0.08 v placebo). Every patient who improved used at least five of six of the prescribed rectal SCFA irrigations, whereas only 37% who did not improve were as compliant. In the open-label extension trial, 65% improved on SCFA; these patients also had significant reductions (p < 0.02) in their clinical and histological activity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although SCFA enemas were not of therapeutic value in this controlled trial, the results suggest efficacy in subsets of patients with distal ulcerative colitis including those with short active episodes. Prolonged contact with rectal mucosa seems to be necessary for therapeutic benefit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.40.4.485

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Breuer, R. I., Soergel, K. H., Lashner, B. A., Christ, M. L., Hanauer, S. B., Vanagunas, A., Harig, J. M., Keshavarzian, A., Robinson, M., Sellin, J. H., Weinberg, D., Vidican, D. E., Flemal, K. L., & Rademaker, A. W.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-04
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
485-491
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2117513967
Cited by
281
References
1
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.40.4.485
The paper
Breuer, R. I., Soergel, K. H., Lashner, B. A., Christ, M. L., Hanauer, S. B., Vanagunas, A., Harig, J. M., Keshavarzian, A., Robinson, M., Sellin, J. H., Weinberg, D., Vidican, D. E., Flemal, K. L., & Rademaker, A. W. (1997). Short chain fatty acid rectal irrigation for left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised, placebo controlled trial. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.40.4.485

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.