Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Responses to gastric distension in functional dyspepsia

Open access
Salet, G A M, Samsom, M, Roelofs, J M M, van Berge Henegouwen, G P, Smout, A J P M, Akkermans, L M A·1998·Gut

Abstract

Background —Studies have shown that an altered visceral perception threshold plays a role in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms in dyspeptic patients. However, it is not clear whether the compliance and adaptive relaxation of the proximal stomach contribute to the symptoms. Aims —To investigate whether abnormal relaxation or adaptation of the proximal stomach during the interdigestive state and the postprandial phase could explain the symptoms of functional dyspepsia. Subjects —Twelve volunteers and 12 patients with dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia were included in the study. Methods —An electronic barostat was used to investigate adaptation to distension of the proximal stomach and accommodation in response to a liquid meal. Dyspeptic symptoms during distension and accommodation were assessed. Results —When the subjects were in the fasting state, the pressure-volume curve showed slightly higher compliance in the dyspeptic patients (p<0.05). Patients not only had a higher score for nausea, bloating, and pain but also the increase in nausea and pain scores with intragastric pressure was higher than in volunteers (p<0.05). The increase in intragastric bag volume in response to a meal was significantly lower in patients (p<0.05). Both bloating and pain significantly increased in the patients (p<0.05), but not in the healthy volunteers. Conclusions —Patients with functional dyspepsia show slightly higher compliance to mechanical distension. Their visceral perception of mechanical stress is enhanced. In contrast with the balloon distension, relaxation after a meal was less. Therefore the postprandial symptoms cannot be explained fully by greater global tension in the stomach wall, as assessed by the barostat technique. Visceral hypersensitivity plays a major role in the pathogenesis of the symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gut.42.6.823

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Salet, G. A. M., Samsom, M., Roelofs, J. M. M., van Berge Henegouwen, G. P., Smout, A. J. P. M., & Akkermans, L. M. A.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-06-01
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
823-829
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2137064156
Cited by
206
References
0
FWCI
11.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses to gastric distension in functional dyspepsia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.42.6.823
The paper
Salet, G. A. M., Samsom, M., Roelofs, J. M. M., van Berge Henegouwen, G. P., Smout, A. J. P. M., & Akkermans, L. M. A. (1998). Responses to gastric distension in functional dyspepsia. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.42.6.823

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.