The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of death in cirrhotic patients. This neoplasm is associated with liver cirrhosis (LC) in more than 90% of cases. Early diagnosis and treatment of HCC are expected to improve survival of patients. AIMS: To assess the cost effectiveness of a surveillance programme of patients with LC for the early diagnosis and treatment of HCC. PATIENTS: A cohort of 313 Italian patients with LC were enrolled in the surveillance programme between March 1989 and November 1991. In the same period, 104 consecutive patients with incidentally detected HCC were referred to our centre and served as a control group. METHODS: Surveillance was based on ultrasonography (US) and α fetoprotein (AFP) determinations repeated at six month intervals. Risk factors for HCC were assessed by multivariate analysis (Cox model). Outcome measures analysed were: (1) number and size of tumours; (2) eligibility for treatment; and (3) survival of patients. Economic issues were: (1) overall cost of surveillance programme; (2) cost per treatable HCC; and (3) cost per year of life saved (if any). Costs were assessed according to charges for procedures at our university hospital. RESULTS: Surveillance lasted a mean of 56 (31) months (range 6–100). During the follow up, 61 patients (19.5%) developed HCC (unifocal at US in 49 cases), with an incidence of 4.1% per year of follow up. AFP, Child-Pugh classes B and C, and male sex were detected as independent risk factors for developing HCC. Only 42 (68.9%) of 61 liver tumours were treated by surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation, or local therapy. The cumulative survival rate of the 61 patients with liver tumours detected in the surveillance programme was significantly longer than that of controls (p=0.02) and multivariate analysis showed an association between surveillance and survival. The overall cost of the surveillance programme was US$753 226, the cost per treatable HCC was US$17 934, and the cost for year of life saved was US$112 993. CONCLUSION: Our surveillance policy of patients with LC requires a large number of resources and offers little benefit in terms of patient survival. The decision whether to adopt a surveillance policy towards HCC should rely on the prevalence of the disease in the population and on the resources of a particular country.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870 · cited 1×
“The cumulative rate of HCC detected during the surveillance programme and survival curves for HCC detected during follow up and those in the unsurveilled population were calculated by life tables according to the Kaplan-Maier method”
MethodAdvances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy
Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199304293281706 · Cited by 547
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
Self-citationTzartzeva, K., Obi, J., Rich, N. E., Parikh, N. D., Marrero, J. A., Yopp, A., Waljee, A. K., & Singal, A. G. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064 · Cited by 1,207
Singal, A. G., Pillai, A., & Tiro, J. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001624 · Cited by 817
The Etiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Consequences for Treatment
Sanyal, A. J., Yoon, S. K., & Lencioni, R. (2010) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2010-s4-14 · Cited by 517
Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Lee, J. H., Lee, J.-H., Lim, Y.-S., Yeon, J. E., Song, T.-J., Yu, S. J., Gwak, G.-Y., Kim, K. M., Kim, Y. J., Lee, J. W., et al. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.055 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolondi, L., Sofia, S., Siringo, S., Gaiani, S., Casali, A., Zironi, G., Piscaglia, F., Gramantieri, L., Zanetti, M., & Sherman, M.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-259
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2155592152
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.48.2.251
- The paper
- Bolondi, L., Sofia, S., Siringo, S., Gaiani, S., Casali, A., Zironi, G., Piscaglia, F., Gramantieri, L., Zanetti, M., & Sherman, M. (2001). Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.2.251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.