The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secular trends in the epidemiology and outcome of Barrett's oesophagus in Olmsted County, Minnesota
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has increased greatly. Barrett's oesophagus is a known risk factor. AIMS: To identify changes in the incidence, prevalence, and outcome of Barrett's oesophagus in a defined population. SUBJECTS: Residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with clinically diagnosed Barrett's oesophagus, or oesophageal or oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Cases were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records linkage system. Records were reviewed with follow up to 1 January 1998. RESULTS: The incidence of clinically diagnosed Barrett's oesophagus (>3 cm) increased 28-fold from 0.37/100 000 person years in 1965–69 to 10.5/100 000 in 1995–97. Of note, gastroscopic examinations increased 22-fold in this same time period. The prevalence of diagnosed Barrett's oesophagus increased from 22.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7–33.6) per 100 000 in 1987 to 82.6/100 000 in 1998. The prevalence of short segment Barrett's oesophagus (<3 cm) in 1998 was 33.4/ 100 000. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus had shorter than expected survival but only one patient with Barrett's oesophagus died from adenocarcinoma. Only four of 64 adenocarcinomas occurred in patients with previously known Barrett's oesophagus. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of clinically diagnosed Barrett's oesophagus have increased in parallel with the increased use of endoscopy. We infer that the true population prevalence of Barrett's oesophagus has not changed greatly, although the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma increased 10-fold. Many adenocarcinomas occurred in patients without a previous diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus, suggesting that many people with this condition remain undiagnosed in the community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Melton, L. J. (1996) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/71.3.266 · Cited by 1,443
Self-citationAdvances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy
Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199304293281706 · Cited by 547
The Threat to Medical-Records Research
Melton, L. J. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199711133372012 · Cited by 245
Self-citation
Cited by
Food and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Surdea-Blaga, T., Negrutiu, D. E., Palage, M., & Dumitrascu, D. L. (2019) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867324666170515123807 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Conio, M., Cameron, A. J., Romero, Y., Branch, C. D., Schleck, C. D., Burgart, L. J., Zinsmeister, A. R., Melton, L. J., & Locke, G. R.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 304-309
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2164923036
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secular trends in the epidemiology and outcome of Barrett's oesophagus in Olmsted County, Minnesota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.48.3.304
- The paper
- Conio, M., Cameron, A. J., Romero, Y., Branch, C. D., Schleck, C. D., Burgart, L. J., Zinsmeister, A. R., Melton, L. J., & Locke, G. R. (2001). Secular trends in the epidemiology and outcome of Barrett's oesophagus in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.48.3.304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.