The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori : a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The magnitude of the association between Helicobacter pylori and incidence of gastric cancer is unclear. H pylori infection and the circulating antibody response can be lost with development of cancer; thus retrospective studies are subject to bias resulting from classification of cases as H pylori negative when they were infected in the past. AIMS: To combine data from all case control studies nested within prospective cohorts to assess more reliably the relative risk of gastric cancer associated with H pylori infection. To investigate variation in relative risk by age, sex, cancer type and subsite, and interval between blood sampling and cancer diagnosis. METHODS: Studies were eligible if blood samples for H pylori serology were collected before diagnosis of gastric cancer in cases. Identified published studies and two unpublished studies were included. Individual subject data were obtained for each. Matched odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the association between H pylori and gastric cancer. RESULTS: Twelve studies with 1228 gastric cancer cases were considered. The association with H pylori was restricted to non-cardia cancers (OR 3.0; 95% CI 2.3–3.8) and was stronger when blood samples for H pylori serology were collected 10+ years before cancer diagnosis (5.9; 3.4–10.3). H pylori infection was not associated with an altered overall risk of cardia cancer (1.0; 0.7–1.4). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that 5.9 is the best estimate of the relative risk of non-cardia cancer associated with H pylori infection and that H pylori does not increase the risk of cardia cancer. They also support the idea that when H pylori status is assessed close to cancer diagnosis, the magnitude of the non-cardia association may be underestimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of human carcinogens—Part B: biological agents
Bouvard, V., Baan, R., Straif, K., Grosse, Y., Secretan, B., Ghissassi, F. E., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Freeman, C., Galichet, L., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70096-8 · Cited by 2,935
Ajani, J. A., Lee, J., Sano, T., Janjigian, Y. Y., Fan, D., & Song, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.36 · Cited by 594
Ingested nitrate and nitrite and stomach cancer risk: An updated review
Bryan, N. S., Alexander, D. D., Coughlin, J. R., Milkowski, A. L., & Boffetta, P. (2012) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.062 · Cited by 335
The Clinical Evidence Linking Helicobacter pylori to Gastric Cancer
Moss, S. F. (2017) · Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.12.001 · Cited by 321
Buckland, G., Agudo, A., Luján, L., Jakszyn, P., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B., Palli, D., Boeing, H., Carneiro, F., Krogh, V., Sacerdote, C., et al. (2010) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28209 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Helicobacter and Cancer Collaborative Group
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 347-353
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2117879926
- Cited by
- 1,038
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori : a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.49.3.347
- The paper
- Helicobacter and Cancer Collaborative Group. (2001). Gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori : a combined analysis of 12 case control studies nested within prospective cohorts. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.49.3.347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.