The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The efficacy of azathioprine for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a 30 year review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on factors predicting response to azathioprine and uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The notes of patients attending the Oxford IBD clinic from 1968 to 1999 were reviewed. Remission was defined as no need for oral steroids for at least three months and relapse was defined as active disease requiring steroids. RESULTS: A total of 622 of 2205 patients were treated with azathioprine (272 Crohn's disease, 346 ulcerative colitis, and four indeterminate colitis). Mean duration of the initial course of treatment was 634 days. The overall remission rates were 45% for Crohn's disease and 58% for ulcerative colitis. For the 424 patients who received more than six months of treatment, remission rates were 64% and 87%, respectively. Factors favouring remission were ulcerative colitis (p=0.0001), lower white blood cell (WBC) or neutrophil count (p=0.0001), higher mean cell volume (p=0.0001), and older age (p=0.05). For Crohn's disease, colonic disease favoured remission (p=0.03). Factors that were not significant were age, sex, lymphocyte count, and dose (mg/kg). The proportion of patients remaining in remission at one, three, and five years was 0.95, 0.69, and 0.55, respectively. The chance of remaining in remission was higher if WBC was less than 5 x 10(9) (p=0.03) and in male patients (p=0.01; Crohn's disease only). There was no difference in relapse rates between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. After stopping azathioprine, the proportion of patients remaining in remission at one, three, and five years was 0.63, 0.44, and 0.35 (222 patients). Duration of azathioprine treatment did not affect the relapse rate after stopping treatment (p=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Azathioprine is effective treatment for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The efficacy of azathioprine is reasonably well sustained over five years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dignass, A., Lindsay, J. O., Sturm, A., Windsor, A., Colombel, J.-F., Allez, M., D'Haens, G., D'Hoore, A., Mantzaris, G., Novacek, G., et al. (2012) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2012.09.002 · Cited by 1,548
Harbord, M., Eliakim, R., Bettenworth, D., Karmiris, K., Katsanos, K., Kopylov, U., Kucharzik, T., Molnár, T., Raine, T., Sebastian, S., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx009 · Cited by 1,180
TAKAGI, S., UTSUNOMIYA, K., KURIYAMA, S., YOKOYAMA, H., TAKAHASHI, S., IWABUCHI, M., TAKAHASHI, H., TAKAHASHI, S., KINOUCHI, Y., HIWATASHI, N., et al. (2006) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03120.x · Cited by 292
Sack, C., Phan, V. A., Grafton, R., Holtmann, G., van Langenberg, D. R., Brett, K., Clark, M., & Andrews, J. M. (2012) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2011.08.019 · Cited by 121
Vidal, A., Gómez-Gil, E., Sans, M., Portella, M. J., Salamero, M., Piqué, J. M., & Panés, J. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00476.x · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, A. G.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-489
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153190211
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The efficacy of azathioprine for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a 30 year review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.50.4.485
- The paper
- Fraser, A. G. (2002). The efficacy of azathioprine for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a 30 year review. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.4.485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.