The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance
Open accessAbstract
Background: Oesophageal clearance of acid reflux consists of an initial volume clearance followed by neutralisation of the acidified mucosa by swallowed saliva (chemical clearance). Ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM), a frequent finding in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), has been claimed to underlie prolonged acid clearance by affecting oesophageal emptying and saliva transport. Intraluminal impedance allows non-radiological monitoring of movement of oesophageal liquids. Aims: To evaluate the relevance of IOM during oesophageal volume and chemical clearance using combined pH impedance measurements. Subjects: Impedance was validated with fluoroscopy to study volume clearance in three healthy subjects. Acid clearance tests were performed in 10 healthy subjects in the upright and supine positions, before and after oesophageal peristaltic disruption with sildenafil 50 mg. Methods: After instillation of an acid bolus, simultaneous manometry, pH, and impedance were used to study oesophageal motility, chemical clearance, and volume clearance, respectively. Results: Impedance allowed assessment of volume clearance accurately, showing a strong correlation with fluoroscopy ( r 2 =0.89). Sildenafil provoked a graded impairment in oesophageal motility in healthy subjects without affecting saliva secretion. In the upright position, volume clearance was slightly prolonged only with severe IOM (>80% abnormal peristaltic sequences). In the supine position, severe IOM significantly prolonged chemical and volume clearance. Moderate IOM (30–80% abnormal peristalsis) had no effect. With normal peristalsis and moderate IOM, clearance times were similar in the upright and supine positions. Severe IOM however had a greater impact on clearance in the supine than in the upright position. Conclusion: Ineffective oesophageal motility has little effect on oesophageal clearance during upright acid reflux. With supine reflux, only severe IOM is associated with prolonged oesophageal clearance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines
Zaninotto, G., Bennett, C., Boeckxstaens, G., Costantini, M., Ferguson, M. K., Pandolfino, J. E., Patti, M. G., Ribeiro, U., Richter, J., Swanstrom, L., et al. (2018) · Diseases of the Esophagus · doi:10.1093/dote/doy071 · Cited by 357
Self-citationDeterminants of perception of heartburn and regurgitation
Bredenoord, A. J., Weusten, B. L. A. M., Curvers, W. L., Timmer, R., & Smout, A. J. P. M. (2006) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2005.074690 · Cited by 294
Tutuian, R., & Castell, D. O. (2004) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30035.x · Cited by 259
Food and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Surdea-Blaga, T., Negrutiu, D. E., Palage, M., & Dumitrascu, D. L. (2019) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867324666170515123807 · Cited by 101
Gullung, J. L., Hill, E. G., Castell, D. O., & Martin-Harris, B. (2012) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/000348941212101107 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Simrén, M., Silny, J., Holloway, R., Tack, J., Janssens, J., & Sifrim, D.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 784-790
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2156965208
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gut.52.6.784
- The paper
- Simrén, M., Silny, J., Holloway, R., Tack, J., Janssens, J., & Sifrim, D. (2003). Relevance of ineffective oesophageal motility during oesophageal acid clearance. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.52.6.784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.