The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus
Open accessAbstract
These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument was followed to provide a methodological strategy for the guideline development. A systematic review of the literature was performed for English language articles published up until December 2012 in order to address controversial issues in Barrett's oesophagus including definition, screening and diagnosis, surveillance, pathological grading for dysplasia, management of dysplasia, and early cancer including training requirements. The rigour and quality of the studies was evaluated using the SIGN checklist system. Recommendations on each topic were scored by each author using a five-tier system (A+, strong agreement, to D+, strongly disagree). Statements that failed to reach substantial agreement among authors, defined as >80% agreement (A or A+), were revisited and modified until substantial agreement (>80%) was reached. In formulating these guidelines, we took into consideration benefits and risks for the population and national health system, as well as patient perspectives. For the first time, we have suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria. In order to improve communication between clinicians, we recommend the use of minimum datasets for reporting endoscopic and pathological findings. We advocate endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer, which should be performed in high-volume centres. We hope that these guidelines will standardise and improve management for patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
Brouwers, M. C., Kho, M. E., Browman, G. P., Burgers, J. S., Cluzeau, F., Feder, G., Fervers, B., Graham, I. D., Grimshaw, J., Hanna, S. E., et al. (2010) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.090449 · Cited by 3,790
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109
Jess, T., Rungoe, C., & Peyrin–Biroulet, L. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.010 · Cited by 958
Medication Usage and the Risk of Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus
Nguyen, D. M., El-Serag, H. B., Henderson, L., Stein, D., Bhattacharyya, A., & Sampliner, R. E. (2009) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.001 · Cited by 159
Cited by
The Epidemiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Coleman, H. G., Xie, S.-H., & Lagergren, J. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.046 · Cited by 549
Self-citationfor the SIF-AIGO-FIMMG Group, Scarpignato, C., on behalf of the Italian Society of Pharmacology, T. I. A. O. H. G., Gatta, L., Zullo, A., & Blandizzi, C. (2016) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0718-z · Cited by 469
Arnold, M., Laversanne, M., Brown, L. M., Devesa, S. S., & Bray, F. (2017) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.155 · Cited by 465
Diagnosis and management of Cornelia de Lange syndrome: first international consensus statement
Kline, A. D., Moss, J. F., Selicorni, A., Bisgaard, A.-M., Deardorff, M. A., Gillett, P. M., Ishman, S. L., Kerr, L. M., Levin, A. V., Mulder, P. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0031-0 · Cited by 367
Bisschops, R., Areia, M., Coron, E., Dobru, D., Kaskas, B., Kuvaev, R., Pech, O., Ragunath, K., Weusten, B., Familiari, P., et al. (2016) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/s-0042-113128 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzgerald, R. C., di Pietro, M., Ragunath, K., Ang, Y., Kang, J.-Y., Watson, P., Trudgill, N., Patel, P., Kaye, P. V., Sanders, S., O'Donovan, M., Bird-Lieberman, E., Bhandari, P., Jankowski, J. A., Attwood, S., Parsons, S. L., Loft, D., Lagergren, J., Moayyedi, P., Lyratzopoulos, G., & de Caestecker, J.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-10-28
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-42
- ISSN
- 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3288
- OpenAlex
- W2125681184
- Cited by
- 1,346
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 95.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372
- The paper
- Fitzgerald, R. C., di Pietro, M., Ragunath, K., Ang, Y., Kang, J.-Y., Watson, P., Trudgill, N., Patel, P., Kaye, P. V., Sanders, S., O'Donovan, M., Bird-Lieberman, E., Bhandari, P., Jankowski, J. A., Attwood, S., Parsons, S. L., Loft, D., Lagergren, J., Moayyedi, P., . . . de Caestecker, J. (2014). British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.