Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus

Open access
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C, di Pietro, Massimiliano, Ragunath, Krish, Ang, Yeng, Kang, Jin-Yong, Watson, Peter, Trudgill, Nigel, Patel, Praful, Kaye, Philip V, Sanders, Scott, O'Donovan, Maria, Bird-Lieberman, Elizabeth, Bhandari, Pradeep, Jankowski, Janusz A, Attwood, Stephen, Parsons, Simon L, Loft, Duncan, Lagergren, Jesper, Moayyedi, Paul, Lyratzopoulos, Georgios, de Caestecker, John·2014·Gut

Abstract

These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument was followed to provide a methodological strategy for the guideline development. A systematic review of the literature was performed for English language articles published up until December 2012 in order to address controversial issues in Barrett's oesophagus including definition, screening and diagnosis, surveillance, pathological grading for dysplasia, management of dysplasia, and early cancer including training requirements. The rigour and quality of the studies was evaluated using the SIGN checklist system. Recommendations on each topic were scored by each author using a five-tier system (A+, strong agreement, to D+, strongly disagree). Statements that failed to reach substantial agreement among authors, defined as >80% agreement (A or A+), were revisited and modified until substantial agreement (>80%) was reached. In formulating these guidelines, we took into consideration benefits and risks for the population and national health system, as well as patient perspectives. For the first time, we have suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria. In order to improve communication between clinicians, we recommend the use of minimum datasets for reporting endoscopic and pathological findings. We advocate endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer, which should be performed in high-volume centres. We hope that these guidelines will standardise and improve management for patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,346

Metadata

Authors
Fitzgerald, R. C., di Pietro, M., Ragunath, K., Ang, Y., Kang, J.-Y., Watson, P., Trudgill, N., Patel, P., Kaye, P. V., Sanders, S., O'Donovan, M., Bird-Lieberman, E., Bhandari, P., Jankowski, J. A., Attwood, S., Parsons, S. L., Loft, D., Lagergren, J., Moayyedi, P., Lyratzopoulos, G., & de Caestecker, J.
Venue
Gut
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-10-28
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
7-42
ISSN
  • 0017-5749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3288
OpenAlex
W2125681184
Cited by
1,346
References
4
FWCI
95.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372
The paper
Fitzgerald, R. C., di Pietro, M., Ragunath, K., Ang, Y., Kang, J.-Y., Watson, P., Trudgill, N., Patel, P., Kaye, P. V., Sanders, S., O'Donovan, M., Bird-Lieberman, E., Bhandari, P., Jankowski, J. A., Attwood, S., Parsons, S. L., Loft, D., Lagergren, J., Moayyedi, P., . . . de Caestecker, J. (2014). British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.