The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the utility of tumour mutational signatures for identifying hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis syndrome carriers
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Objective: Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes and in the base excision repair gene MUTYH underlie hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyposis syndromes. We evaluated the robustness and discriminatory potential of tumour mutational signatures in CRCs for identifying germline PV carriers. Design: Whole-exome sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) CRC tissue was performed on 33 MMR germline PV carriers, 12 biallelic MUTYH germline PV carriers, 25 sporadic MLH1 methylated MMR-deficient CRCs (MMRd controls) and 160 sporadic MMR-proficient CRCs (MMRp controls) and included 498 TCGA CRC tumours. COSMIC V3 single base substitution (SBS) and indel (ID) mutational signatures were assessed for their ability to differentiate CRCs that developed in carriers from non-carriers. Results: The combination of mutational signatures SBS18 and SBS36 contributing >30% of a CRC’s signature profile was able to discriminate biallelic MUTYH carriers from all other non-carrier control CRCs with 100% accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) 1.0). SBS18 and SBS36 were associated with specific MUTYH variants p.Gly396Asp (p=0.025) and p.Tyr179Cys (p=5×10 -5 ), respectively. The combination of ID2 and ID7 could discriminate the 33 MMR PV carrier CRCs from the MMRp control CRCs (AUC 0.99); however, SBS and ID signatures, alone or in combination, could not provide complete discrimination (AUC 0.79) between CRCs from MMR PV carriers and sporadic MMRd controls. Conclusion: Assessment of SBS and ID signatures can discriminate CRCs from biallelic MUTYH carriers and MMR PV carriers from non-carriers with high accuracy, demonstrating utility as a potential diagnostic and variant classification tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even among mismatch repair germline carriers with tumors that are known to show distinct signature patterns27, the SBS1 ‘clock-like’ mutational signature predominated for CH mutations (Extended Data Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3).”
From Germline genetic variation impacts clonal hematopoiesis landscape and progression to malignancy (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods
Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Mathers, C., Parkin, D. M., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., & Bray, F. (2019) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.31937 · Cited by 7,553
Drost, J., van Boxtel, R., Blokzijl, F., Mizutani, T., Sasaki, N., Sasselli, V., de Ligt, J., Behjati, S., Grolleman, J. E., van Wezel, T., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao3130 · Cited by 461
Pilati, C., Shinde, J., Alexandrov, L. B., Assié, G., André, T., Hélias‐Rodzewicz, Z., Ducoudray, R., Le Corre, D., Zucman‐Rossi, J., Emile, J., et al. (2017) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4880 · Cited by 150
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1038/ng828 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.01.001 · DOI
- 10.1245/s10434-012-2858-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djs351 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5590 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.30197 · DOI
- 10.1038/gim.2013.166 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6870 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.041 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.050 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.2762 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx367 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12477 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-1943-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
- Viel, 2017, A specific mutational signature associated with DNA 8-oxoguanine persistence in MUTYH-defective colorectal cancer, EBioMedicine, 20, 39, 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s12885-019-5677-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0648 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyy006 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature11252 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ijc.25870 · DOI
- 10.1111/jgh.13468 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep13321 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx604 · DOI
- Webb AR . Statistical pattern recognition. 2nd edn. West Sussex, England: Wiley, 2002. · DOI
- Johnson, 1998, Applied multivariate statistical analysis, Biometrics, 54, 10.2307/2533879 · DOI
- Hastie T , Tibshirani R , Friedman J . The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, second edition (Springer series in statistics. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer, 2016.
- 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 · DOI · Paper page
- VCV000230638.1 - ClinVar - NCBI. ClinVar - Genomic variation as it relates to human health., 2019. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/230638/ [Accessed 11 Dec2019].
- Gulhan, 2019, Detecting the mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency in clinical samples, Nat Genet, 51, 912, 10.1038/s41588-019-0390-2 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-016-0893-4 · DOI
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314057 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.3287 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.022 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8484122 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.12.004 · DOI
- Loughrey MB , McGrath J , Coleman HG , et al . Identifying mismatch repair‐deficient colon cancer: near‐perfect concordance between immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing in a large, population‐based series. Histopathology;5.doi:10.1111/his.14233 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-05228-y · DOI
Cited by
The pancreatic cancer genome revisited
Hayashi, A., Hong, J., & Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-021-00463-z · Cited by 211
A natural mutator allele shapes mutation spectrum variation in mice
Sasani, T. A., Ashbrook, D. G., Beichman, A. C., Lu, L., Palmer, A. A., Williams, R. W., Pritchard, J. K., & Harris, K. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04701-5 · Cited by 64
Germline genetic variation impacts clonal hematopoiesis landscape and progression to malignancy
Liu, J., Tran, D., Xue, L., Wiley, B. J., Vlasschaert, C., Watson, C. J., MacGregor, H. A. J., Zong, X., Chan, I. C. C., Das, I., et al. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02250-x · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Georgeson, P., Pope, B. J., Rosty, C., Clendenning, M., Mahmood, K., Joo, J. E., Walker, R., Hutchinson, R. A., Preston, S., Como, J., Joseland, S., Win, A. K., Macrae, F. A., Hopper, J. L., Mouradov, D., Gibbs, P., Sieber, O. M., O'Sullivan, D. E., Brenner, D. R., Gallinger, S., Jenkins, M. A., Winship, I. M., & Buchanan, D. D.
- Venue
- Gut
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2021-01-07
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2138-2149
- ISSN
- 0017-5749
- 1468-3288
- PMC
- PMC8260632
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1125269)
- National Cancer Institute (U01 CA074778, U01 CA167551, U01/U24 CA097735)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review