Cited by 3,341

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method

Bland, J Martin, Altman, Douglas G·1995·BMJ

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lee, 1980, Clinical judgements and statistics: lessons from a simulated randomized trial in coronary artery disease., Circulation, 61, 508, 10.1161/01.CIR.61.3.508 · DOI
  2. Williams, 1992, The care of people over 75 years old after discharge from hospital: an evaluation of timetabled visiting by health visitor assistants., J Pub Hlth Med, 14, 138
  3. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91944-H · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1995-01-21
Volume
310
Issue
6973
Pages
170
ISSN
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
Cited by
3,341
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review