Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The French paradox: lessons for other countries

Open access
Ferrières, Jean·2004·Heart

Abstract

Life is the art of drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises'' -Samuel Butler T he French paradox is the observation of low coronary heart disease (CHD) death rates despite high intake of dietary cholesterol and saturated fat. 1 2 The French paradox concept was formulated by French epidemiologists 3 in the 1980s.France is actually a country with low CHD incidence and mortality (table 1).The mean energy supplied by fat was 38% in Belfast and 36% in Toulouse in 1985-86.4 More recently, in 1995-97, the percentage of energy from fat was 39% in Toulouse according to a representative population survey. THE FRENCH PARADOX AND CAUSES OF DEATH cThe first source of error could come from an underestimated CHD mortality.According to this hypothesis, French physicians may not declare all the CHD deaths as CHD.If standardised datafor example those provided by the MONICA (monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) project-are used, the results concerning CHD attack and mortality rates show that France is at a low risk for CHD (table 1).Under certification of CHD deaths in France is a possible bias, but after correction, it remains a low bias.Thus, validated data on CHD mortality and incidence show that France is characterised by CHD risk, corroborating the first part of the French paradox definition. THE FRENCH PARADOX AND SATURATED FATIn correlation studies, measures that represent characteristics of an entire population (consumption of animal fat, daily milk, and alcohol) are used to describe disease (CHD mortality).Limitations of correlational studies are the inability to link exposure with disease in particular individuals, the lack of ability to control the effects of potential confounding factors, and the use of average exposure levels rather than actual individual values.Numerous correlation studies have been carried out in various countries concerning the relation between consumption of fat and CHD mortality.1 2 In one of the most interesting ones, Artaud-Wild and colleagues examined the relation of CHD mortality to the intake of foodstuffs and nutrients in 40 countries.2 After having defined a cholesterol-saturated fat index (CSI), they studied the relation between the CSI and CHD mortality (per 100 000 men aged 55-64 years) for all 40 countries (fig 1).France had a CSI of 24 per 1000 kcal and a CHD mortality rate of 198, whereas Finland had a CSI of 26 per 1000 kcal and a CHD mortality rate of 1031.In the seven countries study, 12 763 men from 16 cohorts in seven countries were examined for CHD risk factors in 1958.Information on diet was collected by use of seven day food records.5 The average consumption of animal food groups, with the exception of fish, was positively associated with 25 year CHD mortality rates.Furthermore, the average population intake of saturated fat was strongly related to 10 and 25 year CHD mortality rates.It is interesting to compare the World Health Organization dietary recommendations for saturated fat (, 10% of total energy) with actual intakes in France.In representative cross sectional surveys of the French population performed in 1986-87 and 1995-97, the saturated fat intake was 15% of the total energy intake in the first survey and 16% in the latter survey.This high consumption of saturated fatty acids is such that French subjects are exposed to a high risk of CHD.Why a high consumption of saturated fatty acids does not lead to a high CHD risk in France (and maybe elsewhere) is a central question behind the French paradox concept.The French paradox is a way of presenting provocative results from epidemiological studies and does not take into account causality between risk factors and CHD mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/heart.90.1.107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Ferrières, J.
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-12-15
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
107-111
ISSN
  • 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-201X
OpenAlex
W2058638223
Cited by
302
References
1
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The French paradox: lessons for other countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/heart.90.1.107
The paper
Ferrières, J. (2004). The French paradox: lessons for other countries. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.90.1.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.