The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marital status and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: The influence of marital status on the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and prognosis after CVD is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the literature to determine how marital status influences CVD and prognosis after CVD. Methods: A search of MEDLINE and Embase in January 2018 without language restriction was performed to identify studies that evaluated the association between marital status and risk of CVD. Search terms related to both marital status and CVD were used and included studies had to be prospective in design. The outcomes of interest were CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke incidence and mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis stratified by the types of population by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Our analysis included 34 studies with more than two million participants. Compared with married participants, being unmarried (never married, divorced or widowed) was associated with increased odds of CVD (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.01), CHD (OR 1.16,95% CI 1.04 to 1.28), CHD death (OR 1.43,95% CI 1.28 to 1.60) and stroke death (OR 1.55,95% 1.16 to 2.08). Being divorced was associated with increased odds of CHD (P<0.001) for both men and women while widowers were more likely to develop a stroke (P<0.001). Single men and women with myocardial infarction had increased mortality (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.76) compared with married participants. Conclusions: Marital status appears to influence CVD and prognosis after CVD. These findings may suggest that marital status should be considered in the risk assessment for CVD and outcomes of CVD based on marital status merits further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.060410 · Cited by 1,052 · cited 1×
“plots if there is no evidence of significant heterogeneity.[23] Further subgroup analyses were”
BackgroundMarital status and mortality in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Manzoli, L., Villari, P., M Pirone, G., & Boccia, A. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.031 · Cited by 664
Mortality Differentials by Marital Status: An International Comparison
Hu, Y., & Goldman, N. (1990) · Demography · doi:10.2307/2061451 · Cited by 614
Eaker, E. D., Sullivan, L. M., Kelly-Hayes, M., D’Agostino, R. B., & Benjamin, E. J. (2007) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3180f62357 · Cited by 244 · cited 1×
“involved utilising databases, [7,11,14-16,20,24,25] questionnaires, [2,9,13,17,18,26-29] and”
Matthews, K. A., & Gump, B. B. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.3.309 · Cited by 228
Marital Status, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Review of the Evidence
Manfredini, R., De Giorgi, A., Tiseo, R., Boari, B., Cappadona, R., Salmi, R., Gallerani, M., Signani, F., Manfredini, F., Mikhailidis, D. P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2016.6103 · Cited by 202
Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs in coronary heart disease
Kachur, S. M., Chongthammakun, V., Lavie, C. J., Schutter, A. D., Arena, R. A., Milani, R. V., & Franklin, B. A. (2017) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2017.07.002 · Cited by 162
Wu, J. R., Lennie, T. A., Chung, M. L., Frazier, S. K., Dekker, R. L., Biddle, M., & Moser, D. K. (2011) · Heart & Lung · doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2011.09.009 · Cited by 161
Andersen, K. K., Andersen, Z. J., & Olsen, T. S. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.619049 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Ramezankhani, A., Azizi, F., & Hadaegh, F. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215593 · Cited by 163
Yagoub, U., Saiyed, N. S., Al Qahtani, B., Al Zahrani, A. M., Birema, Y., & Al Hariri, I. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262259 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, C. W., Kwok, C. S., Narain, A., Gulati, M., Mihalidou, A. S., Wu, P., Alasnag, M., Myint, P. K., & Mamas, M. A.
- Venue
- Heart
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2018-06-19
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 1937-1948
- ISSN
- 1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2809385380
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marital status and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313005
- The paper
- Wong, C. W., Kwok, C. S., Narain, A., Gulati, M., Mihalidou, A. S., Wu, P., Alasnag, M., Myint, P. K., & Mamas, M. A. (2018). Marital status and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.