The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effectiveness of middle and high school-based suicide prevention programmes for adolescents: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of middle and high school-based suicide prevention curricula. Data sources: The following were searched: Ovid MEDLINE(R) in-process and other non-indexed citations and Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid Healthstar, CINAHL, PsycINFO, all EBM reviews—Cochrane DSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE, CCTR, CMR, HTA, and NHSEED, and the ISI Web of Science, until October 2009; government web pages for statistics and other demographic data in countries where they were available; citation lists of relevant articles. Review methods: Randomised controlled studies, interrupted time series analyses with a concurrent comparison group, studies with follow-up examinations (post-test questionnaires and monitoring suicide rates), and middle to high school-based curriculum studies, including both male and female participants, were included. Results: 36 potentially relevant studies were identified, eight of which met the inclusion criteria. Overall, statistically significant improvements were noted in knowledge, attitude, and help-seeking behaviour. A decrease in self reported ideation was reported in two studies. None reported on suicide rates. Conclusion: Although evidence exists that school-based programmes to prevent suicide among adolescents improve knowledge, attitudes, and help-seeking behaviours, no evidence yet exists that these prevention programmes reduce suicide rates. Further well designed, controlled research is required before such programmes are instituted broadly to populations at risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
An Outcome Evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program
Aseltine, R. H., & DeMartino, R. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.446 · Cited by 463
Evaluating the SOSsuicide prevention program: a replication and extension
Aseltine, R. H., James, A., Schilling, E. A., & Glanovsky, J. (2007) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-161 · Cited by 348 · cited 12×
“However, as stated by Aseltine et al (2007), this attrition can be mostly subject to absences from class, rather than voluntary participant refusal.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAn Evaluation of a School‐Based Suicide Awareness Intervention
Kalafat, J., & Elias, M. (1994) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.1994.tb00747.x · Cited by 160
Cited by
Wang, H., Naghavi, M., Allen, C., Barber, R. M., Bhutta, Z. A., Carter, A., Casey, D. C., Charlson, F. J., Chen, A. Z., Coates, M. M., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31012-1 · Cited by 6,596
Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review
Zalsman, G., Hawton, K., Wasserman, D., van Heeringen, K., Arensman, E., Sarchiapone, M., Carli, V., Höschl, C., Barzilay, R., Balazs, J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30030-x · Cited by 1,765
Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation
Klonsky, E. D., May, A. M., & Saffer, B. Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204 · Cited by 1,675
Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.006 · Cited by 462
Help-Seeking for Suicidal Thoughts and Self-Harm in Young People: A Systematic Review
Michelmore, L., & Hindley, P. (2012) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2012.00108.x · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Cusimano, M. D., & Sameem, M.
- Venue
- Injury Prevention
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-11-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5785
- OpenAlex
- W2121799560
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effectiveness of middle and high school-based suicide prevention programmes for adolescents: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/ip.2009.025502
- The paper
- Cusimano, M. D., & Sameem, M. (2011). The effectiveness of middle and high school-based suicide prevention programmes for adolescents: a systematic review. Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2009.025502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.