Cited by 732Electronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHealth Sciences Research and Education

Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine

Open access
Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R. A., Haynes, R. B., Kaplan, B., Lehmann, H., Tang, P. C.·2001·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of clinical decision support systems to facilitate the practice of evidence-based medicine promises to substantially improve health care quality. OBJECTIVE: To describe, on the basis of the proceedings of the Evidence and Decision Support track at the 2000 AMIA Spring Symposium, the research and policy challenges for capturing research and practice-based evidence in machine-interpretable repositories, and to present recommendations for accelerating the development and adoption of clinical decision support systems for evidence-based medicine. RESULTS: The recommendations fall into five broad areas--capture literature-based and practice-based evidence in machine--interpretable knowledge bases; develop maintainable technical and methodological foundations for computer-based decision support; evaluate the clinical effects and costs of clinical decision support systems and the ways clinical decision support systems affect and are affected by professional and organizational practices; identify and disseminate best practices for work flow-sensitive implementations of clinical decision support systems; and establish public policies that provide incentives for implementing clinical decision support systems to improve health care quality. CONCLUSIONS: Although the promise of clinical decision support system-facilitated evidence-based medicine is strong, substantial work remains to be done to realize the potential benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jamia.2001.0080527

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sim, I., Gorman, P., Greenes, R. A., Haynes, R. B., Kaplan, B., Lehmann, H., & Tang, P. C.
Affiliations
Palo Alto Medical Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Sim, I.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
527-534
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2098044946
Cited by
732
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
39.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM 06780, R01LM006780)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, evidence-based medicine, practice-based evidence, clinical workflow integration, quality of care
MeSH terms
Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review