Cited by 149Electronic Health Records SystemsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTechnology and Human Factors in Education and Health

Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review

Open access
Meunier, Pierre-Yves, Raynaud, Camille, Guimaraes, Emmanuelle, Gueyffier, François, Letrilliart, Laurent·2023·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify and quantify the barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) by primary care professionals (PCPs). METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted using a sequential synthesis design. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library were searched in July 2021. Studies that evaluated CDSSs providing recommendations to PCPs and intended for use during a consultation were included. We excluded CDSSs used only by patients, described as concepts or prototypes, used with simulated cases, and decision supports not considered as CDSSs. A framework synthesis was performed according to the HOT-fit framework (Human, Organizational, Technology, Net Benefits), then a quantitative synthesis evaluated the impact of the HOT-fit categories on CDSS use. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies evaluating 45 CDSSs were included, and 186 main barriers or facilitators were identified. Qualitatively, barriers and facilitators were classified as human (eg, perceived usefulness), organizational (eg, disruption of usual workflow), and technological (eg, CDSS user-friendliness), with explanatory elements. The greatest barrier to using CDSSs was an increased workload. Quantitatively, the human and organizational factors had negative impacts on CDSS use, whereas the technological factor had a neutral impact and the net benefits dimension a positive impact. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the need for CDSS developers to better address human and organizational issues, in addition to technological challenges. We inferred core CDSS features covering these 3 factors, expected to improve their usability in primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.2908

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased workload and misalignment with clinical workflows are among the most common barriers to CDS adoption in clinical settings.

    “Increased workload and misalignment with clinical workflows are among the most common barriers to CDS adoption in clinical settings.12,13”

    From Electronic health record activity changes around new decision support implementation: monitoring using audit logs and topic modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Framework Synthesis reports increased workload for 33 of 45 CDSSs, and the barriers table lists disruption of usual workflow for 25. These findings support both barriers in primary care, but the review does not establish that they are among the most common barriers across clinical settings generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The main failure modes of safety-net AI-ECG deployment are excess downstream testing, incomplete follow-up, and alert fatigue.

    “Its main failure modes are excess downstream testing, incomplete follow-up, and alert fatigue.”

    From AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    Table 3 lists alert fatigue as a barrier to clinical decision support systems in primary care. The cited review does not establish that excess downstream testing or incomplete follow-up are failure modes, nor does it identify these three as the main failure modes of safety-net AI-ECG deployment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • EHR-based CDS tools can streamline workflows by automatically presenting relevant information, thus reducing the need for providers to manually search through extensive records.

    “EHR-based CDS tools can streamline workflows by automatically presenting relevant information, thus reducing the need for providers to manually search through extensive records.10,13”
  • Increased workload (either perceived or experienced) associated with CDS has been identified as a major barrier to CDS adoption.

    “In addition, increased workload (either perceived or experienced) associated with CDS has been identified as a major barrier to CDS adoption.12,13”
  • Existing approaches for evaluating the impact of CDS on provider EHR-use activities and clinical workflow heavily rely on manual data collected through surveys, qualitative interviews, direct observation, and audio/video recording.

    “Existing approaches for evaluating the impact of CDS on provider EHR-use activities and clinical workflow heavily rely on manual data collected through surveys, qualitative interviews, direct observation, and audio/video recording.10,13,16–19”

    From Electronic health record activity changes around new decision support implementation: monitoring using audit logs and topic modeling (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results section says most included studies were mixed-methods or qualitative, and the workflow-barriers table discusses CDSS effects on clinical workflow. Neither passage establishes that evaluations of EHR-use activities and workflow heavily rely on manually collected data. Searches for surveys, interviews, direct observation, and audio/video recording found no passage establishing those methods or their prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. World Health Organisation. Technical Series on Primary Health Care: Quality in Primary Health Care. World Health Organisation; 2018. Accessed Oct 5, 2021. https:// www.who.int/docs/default-source/primary-health-care-conference/ quality.pdf
  2. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE ✦ WWW.ANNFAMMED.ORG ✦ VOL. 21, NO. 1 ✦ JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2023
  3. Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. www. covidence.org
  4. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE ✦ WWW.ANNFAMMED.ORG ✦ VOL. 21, NO. 1 ✦ JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meunier, P.-Y., Raynaud, C., Guimaraes, E., Gueyffier, F., & Letrilliart, L.
Affiliations
Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2023-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
57-69
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W4317773813
Cited by
149
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, primary care, barriers to adoption, HOT-Fit framework, perceived usefulness, workflow disruption, workload, ease of use, primary care providers
MeSH terms
Health Personnel, Humans, Primary Health Care, Technology, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review