Cited by 81AI in cancer detectionCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMedicine and Dermatology Studies History

Whole slide images for primary diagnostics in dermatopathology: A feasibility study

Al-Janabi, Shaimaa, Huisman, André, Vink, Aryan, Leguit, Roos J, Offerhaus, G Johan A, ten Kate, Fiebo J W, van Dijk, Marijke R, van Diest, Paul J·2012·Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, whole slide images (WSI) have been used in many areas of pathology such as teaching, research, digital archiving, teleconsultation and quality assurance testing. However, WSI have not regularly been used for routine diagnosis, because of the lack of validation studies. AIM: To test the validity of using WSI for primary diagnosis of skin diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 skin biopsies and resections which had been diagnosed light microscopically one year previously were scanned at 20× magnification, and rediagnosed by six pathologists (every pathologist assessed his own cases), having the original clinical information available, but blinded to the original diagnoses. The WSI diagnoses were compared to the initial light microscopy diagnosis and classified as concordant, slightly discordant (without clinical consequences) or discordant. RESULTS: The light microscopy and the WSI based diagnosis were concordant in 94% of the cases. The light microscopy and WSI diagnosis were slightly discordant in 6% of the cases. For one of the slightly discrepant cases the WSI diagnosis was considered better, while the original diagnosis was preferred for the other five cases. There were no discordant cases with clinical or prognostic implications. CONCLUSION: Primary histopathological diagnosis of skin biopsies and resections can be done digitally using WSI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200277

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WSIs allow comprehensive evaluation of tissue architecture and cellular morphology while facilitating storage and data sharing across institutions.

    “WSIs allow comprehensive evaluation of tissue architecture and cellular morphology while facilitating storage and data sharing across institutions [41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Janabi, S., Huisman, A., Vink, A., Leguit, R. J., Offerhaus, G. J. A., ten Kate, F. J. W., van Dijk, M. R., & van Diest, P. J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-10-26
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
152-158
ISSN
  • 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4146
OpenAlex
W1971399443
Cited by
81
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Medicine and Dermatology Studies History
Keywords
whole slide images, dermatopathology, digital histopathology, primary diagnosis, skin biopsy, diagnostic agreement, light microscopy comparison, diagnostic accuracy, skin diseases
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Microscopy, Pathology, Clinical, Skin, Skin Diseases, Observer Variation, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review