Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,179

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A simple fluorimetric method for the estimation of free 11-hydroxycorticoids in human plasma

Open access
Mattingly, D.·1962·Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

A simple fluorimetric method is described for measuring free 11-hydroxycorticoids in human plasma. Only 2 ml. of plasma is required for each estimation and the fluorescence is read in a standard direct reading fluorimeter. Six estimations can be completed in one and a half hours. It thus compares favourably with the methods in current use for estimating urinary steroids, and has the added advantage of not being dependent on the accurate collection of 24-hour urine samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jcp.15.4.374

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,179

Metadata

Authors
Mattingly, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1962-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
374-379
ISSN
  • 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4146
OpenAlex
W2121900547
Cited by
1,179
References
0
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple fluorimetric method for the estimation of free 11-hydroxycorticoids in human plasma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.15.4.374
The paper
Mattingly, D. (1962). A simple fluorimetric method for the estimation of free 11-hydroxycorticoids in human plasma. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.15.4.374

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.