The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research
Abstract
#### Take-home messages From a clinical perspective, biomarkers may have a variety of functions, which correspond to different stages (table 1) in disease development, such as in the progression in cancer or cardiovascular disease.1 2 Biomarkers can assist in the care of patients who are asymptomatic (screening biomarkers), those who are suspected to have the disease (diagnostic biomarkers) and those with overt disease (prognostic biomarkers) for whom therapy may or may not have been initiated. Biomarkers can also be used for treatment response (predictive biomarkers) or surveillance after therapy (monitoring biomarkers). Fundamental for the use of biomarkers in all situations is biomarker accuracy—the ability to correctly classify one condition and/or outcome from another (eg, healthy versus diseased). View this table: Table 1 Clinical use of biomarkers: rationale and objectives for use of cancer biomarkers For the clinician, diagnostic testing plays a fundamental role in clinical practice. For instance, daily surgical decision making is based on the correct classification by pathology, radiology and/or clinical chemistry reports involving tissue and/or image evaluation and interpretation of disease conditions—in many decisions the interpretation is based on results in the “grey-area” although requiring “black-and-white” answers for choice of treatment (fig 1). Further, predictive modelling to estimate expected outcomes such as mortality or adverse events based on patient risk characteristics is common in any type of clinical research. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine
Zweig, M. H., & Campbell, G. (1993) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561 · Cited by 6,569
Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer
Pepe, M. S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J. D., Thompson, M. L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M., & Yasui, Y. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054 · Cited by 1,686
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models
Zou, K. H., O’Malley, A. J., & Mauri, L. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.594929 · Cited by 1,473
Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies
McShane, L. M., Altman, D. G., Sauerbrei, W., Taube, S. E., Gion, M., & Clark, G. M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.01.0454 · Cited by 779
Statistical Evaluation of Prognostic versus Diagnostic Models: Beyond the ROC Curve
Cook, N. R. (2008) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.096529 · Cited by 691
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art.
Hanley, J. A. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 685
Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation
Ransohoff, D. F. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1322 · Cited by 498
Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research
Ransohoff, D. F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1550 · Cited by 487
The Limitations of Risk Factors as Prognostic Tools
Ware, J. H. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp068249 · Cited by 466
The search for new cardiovascular biomarkers
Gerszten, R. E., & Wang, T. J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06802 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Saito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · Cited by 5,309
Immunohistochemistry for Pathologists: Protocols, Pitfalls, and Tips
Kim, S.-W., Roh, J., & Park, C.-S. (2016) · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine · doi:10.4132/jptm.2016.08.08 · Cited by 499
miRNAs as serum biomarkers for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Cacchiarelli, D., Legnini, I., Martone, J., Cazzella, V., D'Amico, A., Bertini, E., & Bozzoni, I. (2011) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201100133 · Cited by 279
Peripheral Markers of Depression
Nobis, A., Zalewski, D., & Waszkiewicz, N. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9123793 · Cited by 197
Cerniauskas, I., Winterer, J., de Jong, J. W., Lukacsovich, D., Yang, H., Khan, F., Peck, J. R., Obayashi, S. K., Lilascharoen, V., Lim, B. K., et al. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.005 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Søreide, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-09-25
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4146
- OpenAlex
- W2068138485
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.2008.061010
- The paper
- Søreide, K. (2009). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2008.061010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.