Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research

Søreide, Kjetil·2009·Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

#### Take-home messages From a clinical perspective, biomarkers may have a variety of functions, which correspond to different stages (table 1) in disease development, such as in the progression in cancer or cardiovascular disease.1 2 Biomarkers can assist in the care of patients who are asymptomatic (screening biomarkers), those who are suspected to have the disease (diagnostic biomarkers) and those with overt disease (prognostic biomarkers) for whom therapy may or may not have been initiated. Biomarkers can also be used for treatment response (predictive biomarkers) or surveillance after therapy (monitoring biomarkers). Fundamental for the use of biomarkers in all situations is biomarker accuracy—the ability to correctly classify one condition and/or outcome from another (eg, healthy versus diseased). View this table: Table 1 Clinical use of biomarkers: rationale and objectives for use of cancer biomarkers For the clinician, diagnostic testing plays a fundamental role in clinical practice. For instance, daily surgical decision making is based on the correct classification by pathology, radiology and/or clinical chemistry reports involving tissue and/or image evaluation and interpretation of disease conditions—in many decisions the interpretation is based on results in the “grey-area” although requiring “black-and-white” answers for choice of treatment (fig 1). Further, predictive modelling to estimate expected outcomes such as mortality or adverse events based on patient risk characteristics is common in any type of clinical research. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jcp.2008.061010

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Søreide, K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-09-25
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4146
OpenAlex
W2068138485
Cited by
300
References
43
FWCI
16.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.2008.061010
The paper
Søreide, K. (2009). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarker research. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2008.061010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.