The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hulley, S. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.7.605 · Cited by 6,216
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7379.41 · Cited by 3,215
Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2261021292 · Cited by 3,215
Estrogen plus Progestin and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
Manson, J. E., Hsia, J., Johnson, K. C., Rossouw, J. E., Assaf, A. R., Lasser, N. L., Trevisan, M., Black, H. R., Heckbert, S. R., Detrano, R., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030808 · Cited by 2,065
Coombes, R. C., Hall, E., Gibson, L. J., Paridaens, R., Jassem, J., Delozier, T., Jones, S. E., Alvarez, I., Bertelli, G., Ortmann, O., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040331 · Cited by 1,759
Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer
Pepe, M. S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J. D., Thompson, M. L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M., & Yasui, Y. (2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.14.1054 · Cited by 1,686
How to Report Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Rennie, D. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080071033 · Cited by 77
Cited by
Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models
Weigelt, B., Peterse, J. L., & van't Veer, L. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1670 · Cited by 2,232
Detection and quantification of mutations in the plasma of patients with colorectal tumors
Diehl, F., Li, M., Dressman, D., He, Y., Shen, D., Szabo, S., Diaz, L. A., Goodman, S. N., David, K. A., Juhl, H., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507904102 · Cited by 1,188
Søreide, K. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.061010 · Cited by 300
Replication and reproducibility in spinal cord injury research
Steward, O., Popovich, P. G., Dietrich, W. D., & Kleitman, N. (2012) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.06.017 · Cited by 186
Caveats and pitfalls of ROC analysis in clinical microarray research (and how to avoid them)
Berrar, D., & Flach, P. (2012) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbr008 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Ransohoff, D. F.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Cancer
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-149
- ISSN
- 1474-175X (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1768
- OpenAlex
- W1549733517
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nrc1550
- The paper
- Ransohoff, D. F. (2005). Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. Nature Reviews Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
