The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bone aluminium in haemodialysed patients and in rats injected with aluminium chloride: relationship to impaired bone mineralisation.
Open accessAbstract
Iliac bone aluminium was determined by neutron activation analysis in 34 patients with chronic renal failure and in eight control subjects. In 17 patients treated by haemodialysis there was a significant increase in the amount of aluminium (mean +/- SE = 152 +/- 30 ppm bone ash). In eight patients treated by haemodialysis and subsequent renal transplantation, bone aluminium was still significantly increased (92 +/- 4.5 ppm bone ash) but was less than in the haemodialysed patients. In some patients aluminium persisted in bone for many years after successful renal transplantation. There was no relationship between hyperparathyroidism and bone aluminium. Although no statistically significant relationship was found between the mineralisation status of bone and bone aluminium, patients dialysed for the longest periods tended to be those with the highest levels of aluminium, osteomalacia, and dialysis encephalopathy. In 20 rats given daily intraperitoneal injections of aluminium chloride for periods of up to three months, there was accumulation of aluminium in bone (163 +/- 9 ppm ash) to levels comparable to those obtained in the dialysis patients, and after about eight weeks osteomalacia developed. The increased bone aluminium and osteomalacia persisted after injections had been stopped for up to 49 days, although endochondral ossification was restored to normal. As a working hypothesis it is suggested that aluminium retained in the bone of the dialysis patients and the experimental animals interferes with normal mineralisation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human Health Risk Assessment for Aluminium, Aluminium Oxide, and Aluminium Hydroxide
Krewski, D., Yokel, R. A., Nieboer, E., Borchelt, D., Cohen, J., Harry, J., Kacew, S., Lindsay, J., Mahfouz, A. M., & Rondeau, V. (2007) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400701597766 · Cited by 998
Evidence of Aluminum Loading in Infants Receiving Intravenous Therapy
Sedman, A. B., Klein, G. L., Merritt, R. J., Miller, N. L., Weber, K. O., Gill, W. L., Anand, H., & Alfrey, A. C. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198505233122101 · Cited by 271
Malluche, H. H., Smith, A. J., Abreo, K., & Faugere, M.-C. (1984) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198407193110302 · Cited by 199
Aluminum and Chronic Renal Failure: Sources, Absorption, Transport, and Toxicity
Wills, M. R., & Savory, J. (1989) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.3109/10408368909106590 · Cited by 100
Microcytic anemia secondary to intraperitoneal aluminum in normal and uremic rats
Kaiser, L., Schwartz, K. A., Burnatowska-Hledin, M. A., & Mayor, G. H. (1984) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1984.169 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, H. A., McCarthy, J. H., & Herrington, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 832-844
- ISSN
- 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4146
- OpenAlex
- W2115891408
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone aluminium in haemodialysed patients and in rats injected with aluminium chloride: relationship to impaired bone mineralisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.32.8.832
- The paper
- Ellis, H. A., McCarthy, J. H., & Herrington, J. (1979). Bone aluminium in haemodialysed patients and in rats injected with aluminium chloride: relationship to impaired bone mineralisation. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.32.8.832
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.