Cited by 49Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlNeonatal Health and BiochemistryAcute Kidney Injury Research

Evaluation of an enzymatic method for determining creatinine in plasma.

Open access
Crocker, H, Shephard, M D, White, G H·1988·Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

An enzymatic kit method for the determination of plasma creatinine was optimised for use with a centrifugal analyser and its performance characteristics and practicability compared with an end point and a kinetic Jaffé-based method. The enzymatic method exhibited several advantages over Jaffé-based methods--namely, smaller sample size, rapid sample throughput (200 per hour), and improved specificity. Glucose, acetoacetate, and cefoxitin did not interfere with the enzymatic method, although bilirubin did cause a negative interference which depended on both creatinine and bilirubin concentrations. The enzymatic method has particular clinical application in neonates, diabetic ketotic patients, and those receiving cephalosporins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jcp.41.5.576

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Creatinine was detected in sweat using a mixture of enzymes (creatininase, creatinase, and peroxidase) and a corresponding responsive dye (4-aminophenazone).

    “Similarly, creatinine, a vital marker of hydration status and renal function, was detected in sweat using a mixture of enzymes (creatininase, creatinase, and peroxidase) and a corresponding responsive dye (4-aminophenazone) (Fig. 3E) (53).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hoffman RG. Establishing quality control and normal ranges in the clinical laboratory. New York: Exposition Press, 1971.
  2. Gerard SK, Khayam-Bashi H. Characterization of creatinine error in ketotic patients. Am J Clin Pathol 1985;84:659-64.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crocker, H., Shephard, M. D., & White, G. H.
Affiliations
Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1988-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
576-581
ISSN
  • 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4146
OpenAlex
W2037545204
Cited by
49
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
serum creatinine, enzymatic creatinine assay, Jaffe method, centrifugal analyser, assay interference, bilirubin interference, neonates, diabetic ketoacidosis, cephalosporins, cefoxitin, sample throughput
MeSH terms
Acetoacetates, Adolescent, Bilirubin, Cefoxitin, Colorimetry, Creatinine, Female, Glucose, Humans, Infant, Methods, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review