Cited by 182Physical Activity and HealthCardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative

Open access
Murphy, Simon Mark, Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Williams, Nefyn, Raisanen, Larry, Moore, Graham, Linck, Pat, Hounsome, Natalia, Din, Nafees Ud +1 more·2012·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Wales National Exercise Referral Scheme (NERS) is a 16-week programme including motivational interviewing, goal setting and relapse prevention. METHOD: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial with nested economic evaluation of 2160 inactive participants with coronary heart disease risk (CHD, 1559, 72%), mild to moderate depression, anxiety or stress (79, 4%) or both (522, 24%) randomised to receive (1) NERS or (2) normal care and brief written information. Outcome measures at 12 months included the 7-day physical activity recall, the hospital anxiety and depression scale. RESULTS: Ordinal regression identified increased physical activity among those randomised to NERS compared with those receiving normal care in all participants (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.43), and among those referred for CHD only (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.60). For those referred for mental health reason alone, or in combination with CHD, there were significantly lower levels of anxiety (-1.56, [corrected] 95% CI -2.75 to -0.38) and depression (-1.39, [corrected] 95% CI -2.60 to -0.18), but no effect on physical activity. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £12,111 per quality adjusted life year, falling to £9741 if participants were to contribute £2 per session. CONCLUSIONS: NERS was effective in increasing physical activity among those referred for CHD risk only. Among mental health referrals, NERS did not influence physical activity but was associated with reduced anxiety and depression. Effects were dependent on adherence. NERS is likely to be cost effective with respect to prevailing payer thresholds. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47680448.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2011-200689

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Public Health Collaborating Centre for Physical Activity. A Rapid Review of the Effectiveness of Exercise Referral Schemes to Promote Physical Activity in Adults. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006
  2. [29]Glick HA Doshi JA Sonnad SS Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials (Handbooks for Health Economic Evaluation). 1st edn Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, S. M., Edwards, R. T., Williams, N., Raisanen, L., Moore, G., Linck, P., Hounsome, N., Din, N. U., & Moore, L.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Simon Mark
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-05-10
Volume
66
Issue
8
Pages
745-753
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2118385537
Cited by
182
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT087640MA)
  • Llywodraeth Cymru
  • Cancer Research UK
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007543/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
physical activity, coronary heart disease risk, depression, anxiety, motivational interviewing, goal setting, relapse prevention, cost-effectiveness, public health policy, program adherence, Wales
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Coronary Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depressive Disorder, Exercise Therapy, Female, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Participation, Psychometrics, Referral and Consultation, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Wales, Program Evaluation, Case-Control Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review