Cited by 158Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsHomelessness and Social Issues

Risk modifying effect of social capital on measures of heavy alcohol consumption, alcohol abuse, harms, and secondhand effects: national survey findings

Open access
Weitzman, Elissa R, Chen, Ying-Yeh·2005·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between social capital and individual risk for alcohol abuse and harms and identify protective effect mechanisms. DESIGN: Multilevel multivariate analysis with individual level data from a national panel survey of drinking and a contextual measure of social capital reflecting college mean aggregate reports of student volunteerism. Outcomes include heavy episodic (binge) drinking, frequent drinking, frequent drunkenness, diagnosable alcohol abuse, intentional drunkenness, acquisition of binge drinking, harms, secondhand effects from others' drinking. SETTING: United States, 119 four year colleges. PARTICIPANTS: Representative samples of youth ages 18-24 surveyed in 1997 and 1999 using an anonymous mailed questionnaire (total n = 27 687). MAIN RESULTS: Students from colleges with higher levels of social capital reported reduced risks for binge drinking (adjusted OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.69, p = 0.002), frequent drunkenness (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.98, p = 0.04), acquisition of binge drinking in college (adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.95, p = 0.03), and alcohol abuse (adjusted OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.91, p = 0.02) in multilevel multivariate analyses that controlled for individual volunteering, the measure on which social capital was based. Higher levels of social capital protected against multiple drinking related harms (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.90, p = 0.02) and secondhand drinking effects (adjusted OR, 0.30, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.58, p = 0.0003). Significant cross level interactions exist between fraternity/sorority membership and social capital for measures of risky drinking. Harm reduction primarily reflects consumption modification. CONCLUSIONS: Social capital exerts strong protective effects on alcohol abuse and harm in college including among high risk students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2004.024711

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weitzman and Chen (2005) found women, non-White students, those 23 and older, or students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds were less likely to use/abuse alcohol, report drinking-related harms, or experience secondhand effects.

    “Conversely, women, non-White students, those 23 and older, or students from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds were less likely to use/abuse alcohol, report drinking-related harms, or experience secondhand effects.”
  • Weitzman and Chen (2005) found fraternity/sorority membership was associated with higher odds of drinking problems, alcohol-related harms, or secondhand effects.

    “The researchers found fraternity/sorority membership was associated with higher odds of drinking problems, alcohol-related harms, or secondhand effects.”
  • Researchers who introduced controls for peer groups or social capital found comparable or diminished effects when relating fraternity membership to consumption patterns.

    “Interestingly, researchers who introduced controls for peer groups or social capital found comparable (Iwamoto et al., 2011) or diminished (Weitzman & Chen, 2005) effects when relating fraternity membership to consumption patterns.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weitzman, E. R., & Chen, Y.-Y.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Weitzman, Elissa R
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-03-14
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
303-309
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2146760641
Cited by
158
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
social capital, alcohol abuse, binge drinking, university students, student volunteering, alcohol-related harm, harm reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Drinking Behavior, Female, Greece, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Risk Factors, Social Support, Students, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Harm Reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review