Cited by 843Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth, Drugs, and Violence

Review of risk and protective factors of substance use and problem use in emerging adulthood

Stone, Andrea L., Becker, Linda G., Huber, Alice M., Catalano, Richard F.·2012·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

This review examines the evidence for longitudinal predictors of substance use and abuse in emerging adulthood. Nationally representative data from the 2007 National Survey on Drug use and Health suggest that many substance use problems reach their peak prevalence during emerging adulthood (usually defined as the period from age 18 to age 26). This stage of development is characterized by rapid transitions into new social contexts that involve greater freedom and less social control than experienced during adolescence. Concurrent with this newfound independence is an increase in rates of substance use and abuse. Understanding the risk and protective factors associated with emerging adult substance use problems is an important step in developing interventions targeting those problems. While multiple reviews have examined risk and protective factors for substance use during adolescence, and many of these earlier predictors may predict emerging adult substance use, few studies have focused primarily on the emerging adult outcomes examining predictors from both adolescence and emerging adulthood. This review used the databases PubMed and PsycInfo to identify articles pertaining to longitudinal predictors of substance use problems in emerging adulthood, building from the conceptual framework presented in a review on risk and protective factors for adolescent substance abuse by Hawkins and colleagues (Hawkins, Catalano, & Miller, 1992). Predictors identified as predictors of substance use in adolescence, sometimes decreased in strength and in one case reversed direction. Unique predictors in emerging adulthood were also identified. Implications for prevention science during adolescence and emerging adulthood are discussed as well as suggestions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.014

Cites

193 of 193 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several biological and social factors have been associated with increased risk of SUDs, including male sex, genetics, younger age of substance use initiation, childhood adverse experiences, and psychiatric comorbidities.

    “Several biological and social factors have been associated with increased risk of SUDs 75 , including male sex, genetics, younger age of substance use initiation, childhood adverse experiences, and psychiatric comorbidities.”
  • Academic success is associated with a healthy diet, lower cigarette, alcohol, and drug use, and higher physical activity.

    “Indirectly, reading could also encourage healthy behaviours in young people by enhancing academic success (OECD, 2002) and reducing the risk of depression (Dowrick et al., 2012), which are in turn associated with a healthy diet (Doku et al., 2011; Gillen et al., 2012), lower cigarette, alcohol, and drug use (Stone et al., 2012), and higher physical activity (Roshanaei-moghaddam et al., 2009).”
  • Reduced risk of depression is associated with a healthy diet, lower cigarette, alcohol, and drug use, and higher physical activity.

    “Indirectly, reading could also encourage healthy behaviours in young people by enhancing academic success (OECD, 2002) and reducing the risk of depression (Dowrick et al., 2012), which are in turn associated with a healthy diet (Doku et al., 2011; Gillen et al., 2012), lower cigarette, alcohol, and drug use (Stone et al., 2012), and higher physical activity (Roshanaei-moghaddam et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, A. L., Becker, L. G., Huber, A. M., & Catalano, R. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Bothell (US)
  • Washington Department of Social and Health Services (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Stone, Andrea L.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
747-775
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997516720
Cited by
843
References
190
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (5U79SPO11193-95)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
emerging adulthood, substance use, substance abuse, risk factors, protective factors, adolescent substance use, coming of age, social control, prevention science, longitudinal predictors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Social Facilitation, Socioeconomic Factors, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review