Cited by 162Urban Transport and AccessibilityPhysical Activity and HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Urban area disadvantage and physical activity: a multilevel study in Melbourne, Australia

Open access
Kavanagh, Anne M, Goller, Jane L, King, Tania, Jolley, Damien, Crawford, David, Turrell, Gavin·2005·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Objective: To estimate variation between small areas in the levels of walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and overall physical activity and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Methods: All census collector districts (CCDs) in the 20 innermost local government areas in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia, were identified and ranked by the percentage of low income households (<$400/week) living in the CCD. Fifty CCDs were randomly selected from the least, middle, and most disadvantaged septiles of the ranked CCDs and 2349 residents (58.7% participation rate) participated in a cross sectional postal survey about physical activity. Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for extrabinomial variation) was used to estimate area level variation in walking, cycling, jogging, and swimming and in overall physical activity participation, and the importance of area level socioeconomic disadvantage in predicting physical activity participation. Results: There were significant variations between CCDs in all activities and in overall physical participation in age and sex adjusted models; however, after adjustment for individual SES (income, occupation, education) and area level socioeconomic disadvantage, significant differences remained only for walking (p = 0.004), cycling (p = 0.003), and swimming (p = 0.024). Living in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged areas was associated with a decreased likelihood of jogging and of having overall physical activity levels that were sufficiently active for health; these effects remained after adjustment for individual socioeconomic status (sufficiently active: OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.90 and jogging: OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.94). Conclusion: These research findings support the need to focus on improving local environments to increase physical activity participation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2005.035931

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fuzhong L, Fisher K, Bauman A, et al. Neighbourhood influences on physical activity. J Aging Phys Activity 2005;13:87-114.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kavanagh, A. M., Goller, J. L., King, T., Jolley, D., Crawford, D., & Turrell, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Kavanagh, Anne M
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-10-18
Volume
59
Issue
11
Pages
934-940
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2144919487
Cited by
162
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
40.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
physical activity, socioeconomic deprivation, urban disadvantage, walking, cycling, jogging, swimming, area-level disadvantage, low-income households, built environment, health disparities, Melbourne
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Urban Health, Victoria, Exercise, Small-Area Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review