Cited by 44Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationPublic Health Policies and Education

Health treaty dilution: a case study of Japan’s influence on the language of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Open access
Assunta, Mary, Chapman, Simon·2006·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background: The Japanese government is an important shareholder in the Japanese tobacco industry. Negotiations to develop the WHO’s historic Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) were based on consensus, resulting in countries needing to agree to the lowest acceptable common denominator in clause development. Objective: To illustrate Japan’s role in negotiating key optional language in the FCTC text. Methods: Summary reports, text proposals, conference papers, and speeches related to the six FCTC negotiation sessions were reviewed for repeated words, concepts and emerging themes. Key stakeholders were interviewed. Key words such as “sovereignty”, “appropriate”, “latitude”, “individual”, “flexibility”, and “may” representing optional language were examined. Results: The Japanese government’s proposals for “appropriate” and optional measures are reflected in the final FCTC text that accommodates flexibility on interpretation and implementation on key tobacco controls. While Japan was not alone in proposing optional language, consensus accommodated their proposals. Conclusion: Japan’s success in arguing for extensive optional language seriously weakened the FCTC. Accordingly, international tobacco control can be expected to be less successful in reducing the burden of disease caused by tobacco use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2005.043794

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the FCTC negotiation, JTI worked actively with the Japanese government to weaken the FCTC.

    “During the FCTC negotiation, JTI worked actively with the Japanese government to weaken the FCTC (Assunta and Chapman 2006).”

    From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as Assunta and Chapman 2006

    The “Setting the tone” section says the Japanese delegation’s proposals closely aligned with JT’s positions, and the Discussion says Japan’s push for optional language weakened the FCTC. The Discussion also says JT and JTI aggressively opposed European tobacco-control measures during the negotiations. It does not say that JTI worked directly with the Japanese government to weaken the treaty; the documented alignment is with JT, not specifically JTI. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. The World Medical Association. The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control on track to become law by the end of the year. World Medical Journal 2004;50:77-8.
  2. Yach D. Injecting greater urgency into global tobacco control. Tob Control 2005;14:73-144.
  3. Roemer R, Taylor A, Lariviere J. Origins of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Am J Public Health 2005;95:936.
  4. Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 2003;15:85-109.
  5. World Health Organisation. Provisional Summary Record of the First Plenary Meeting (A/FCTC/INB6/PL/SR/1 Corr 1). Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2003 (accessed 3 Mar 2005).
  6. Kapp C. Brundtland pleas for tough tobacco treaty meet reality. Lancet 2002;360:1231.
  7. Kapp C. Tobacco-control treaty language approved despite objections. Lancet 2003;361:839-40. 37 Reference withdrawn.
  8. Iwasawa Y. International law, human rights, and Japanese law: the impact of international law on Japanese law. New York: Clarendon Press, 1998.
  9. Levin MA. Smoke around the rising sun: an American look at tobacco regulation in Japan. Standford Law and Policy Review 1997;8:99-123.
  10. Nakamura K, Foreign Ministry Treaty Bureau. Enacted Laws of the 159th session of the Parliament, ''The WHO's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control''. Jurist: Special Issue 2004;1274:85-95.
  11. Framework Convention Alliance. Of orchids, ashtrays and the human spirit. 28 Feb 2003. http://fctc.org/bulletin/Issue_45.pdf (accessed 1 Jun 2005). 49 Reference withdrawn. 50 Reference withdrawn.
  12. Japan Tobacco. Press Release: JT and JTI launch legal challenge against EU tobacco directive. Tokyo: Japan Tobacco, 2001;20 Sep. http://www.jti.com/ english/press_room/press_releases/pr_article_20_09_2001.aspx
  13. Japan Tobacco. Press Release: JT and JTI disagree with European Court of Justice decision to uphold Tobacco Products Directive. Tokyo: Japan Tobacco, 2002;10 Dec. http://www.jti.co.jp/JTI_E/Release/02/r_justice.html

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Assunta, M., & Chapman, S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Assunta, Mary
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-08-11
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
751-756
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2100181669
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Japan, treaty negotiations, tobacco control, tobacco industry influence
MeSH terms
Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, International Cooperation, Japan, Terminology as Topic, Social Control, Formal, Tobacco Use Disorder, World Health Organization, Negotiating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review