Cited by 291Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a valid and reliable tool for measuring mental well-being in diverse populations and projects

Open access
Stewart-Brown, SL, Platt, S, Tennant, A, Maheswaran, H, Parkinson, J, Weich, S, Tennant, R, Taggart, F +1 more·2011·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background The outcomes framework for the new public health and mental health strategies in England (Healthy Lives Healthy People and No Health without Mental Health) both propose monitoring positive mental health. The Office of National Statistics is currently consulting on approaches to the measurement of wellbeing. Public mental health projects and interventions at local level require measurement of mental wellbeing The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) is a possible candidate. Methods WEMWBS was developed in 2007 following UK evaluation of a longer mental wellbeing measure (Affectometer 2), a review of the literature and the support of a multidisciplinary expert panel. It comprises 14 positively worded items relating only to positive attributes of mental health. Quantitative validation has been undertaken in student (n=354) and adult (16 yrs plus; n=2075) UK populations and mixed method evaluations in teenage (13–15 years) and UK dwelling Pakistani and Chinese groups. Results Initial evaluation showed good content validity; confirmatory factor analysis supported a single factor hypothesis (GFI =0.93, AGFI=0.8, RMSEA=0.055); Cronbach's α (0.89) suggested the possibility of item redundancy; item total correlations ranged from 0.52 and 0.80; the distribution was near normal; there were no floor or ceiling effects; test-retest reliability was high (0.83) and the scale discriminated population groups in a way which was consistent with results of other surveys. WEMWBS correlated with criterion scales to the expected extent and in the expected direction. WEMWBS was not RASCH compatible but a reduced 7 item scale, Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) was resolved which met RASCH model requirements. Quantitative evaluations showed the scale to be robust in Chinese and Pakistani groups and in teenagers. Qualitative evaluation broadly supported these findings and offered insights into mental wellbeing across different groups. WEMWBS is sensitive to change in evaluations of diverse public health interventions and programmes including general lifestyle interventions and parenting programmes. It is also sensitive to change in psychiatric populations. Conclusions In addition to offering rigour for research and evaluation in public mental health, WEMWBS' positive focus offers a developmental perspective, helping to orientate policy makers, programme participants and survey respondents towards mental wellbeing and enabling identification of protective and promoting factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2011.143586.86

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart-Brown, S., Platt, S., Tennant, A., Maheswaran, H., Parkinson, J., Weich, S., Tennant, R., Taggart, F., & Clarke, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • National Health Service Scotland (GB)
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-09
Volume
65
Issue
Suppl 2
Pages
A38.2-A39
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2106879643
Cited by
291
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, positive mental health, scale validation, psychometric properties, Rasch analysis, adolescents, parent training, lifestyle intervention, content validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review