The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry.
Open accessAbstract
Occupational groups are often described as being relatively healthy because their mortality rates are lower than those of the national average. Although correct this confuses the issue for those who are interested in assessing the effects of exposure to a particular chemical. In a further analysis of data collected in a study of all men ever exposed to vinyl chloride monomer in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride in Great Britain, three factors have been shown to contribute to the low mortality rates that were observed. The three factors: the selection of a healthy population for employment, the survival in the industry of the healthier men, and the length of time that this population has been pursued, have been quantified. The mortality experience within five years of entering this industry was shown to be as low as 37% of that expected; for circulatory disease and respiratory disease it was as low as 21%. There was a progressive increase in standardized mortality ratio with the length of time since entry so that the effect had almost disappeared 15 years after entry. To avoid confounding the selection effect with the survival effect the latter was measured by separating men who survived 15 years after entering the industry according to whether or not they were still in the industry after this period. Those who had left experienced an overall standardized mortality ratio some 50% higher than those still in the industry. This effect, although consistent in the age groups between 25 and 74 years and for all cause groups studied, was greatest in those aged between 25 and 44 years and for lung cancer and respiratory disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure
Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00392-6 · Cited by 860
A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology
Li, C.-Y., & Sung, F.-C. (1999) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/49.4.225 · Cited by 829
Temporary employment and health: a review
Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Joensuu, M., Virtanen, P., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2005) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyi024 · Cited by 784
Multiplicative Models and Cohort Analysis
Breslow, N. E., Lubin, J. H., Marek, P., & Langholz, B. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10477915 · Cited by 565
The Evolving Concept of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect
Arrighi, H. M., & Hertz-Picciotto, I. (1994) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199403000-00009 · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, A. J., & Collier, P. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1976-12-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 225-230
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- OpenAlex
- W2042873485
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.30.4.225
- The paper
- Fox, A. J., & Collier, P. F. (1976). Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.30.4.225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.