Cited by 829Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology

Li, C.-Y., Sung, F.-C.·1999·Occupational Medicine

Abstract

This review article aims to anatomize sources of the healthy worker effect (HWE) and to summarize advantages and limitations of several approaches frequently proposed to eliminate the HWE. Although the HWE is frequently addressed in the context of selection bias, our review suggests that the selection of occupational cohorts with advantageous health status would preferably be addressed as a source of confounding biases. The authors also conclude that the exclusion of unhealthy workers at employment and the study of active workers are the two main sources of HWE, and that the use of the general population as a comparison group in occupational epidemiology should be avoided if possible. The authors encourage investigators to make distinctions between the underlying factors related to the use of the general population as the comparison group in occupational epidemiology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/occmed/49.4.225

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C.-Y., & Sung, F.-C.
Affiliations
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Li, C.-Y.
Venue
Occupational Medicine
Published
1999
Volume
49
Issue
4
Pages
225-229
ISSN
  • 0962-7480 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8405
OpenAlex
W2158364693
Cited by
829
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 52
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Occupational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
healthy worker effect, selection bias, confounding, occupational cohort, active workers
MeSH terms
Humans, Occupational Medicine, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Bias, Selection Bias, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Cohort Effect, Healthy Worker Effect, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review