Cited by 925Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth Education and Validation

A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study

Open access
Hunt, S M, McKenna, S P, McEwen, J, Backett, E M, Williams, J, Papp, E·1980·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

The current recognition of the importance of perceived health status as a predictor of need for, and utilisation of, health services has led to attempts to produce indicators which assess subjective rather than objective health problems. The development of the Nottingham Health Profile is described, together with a study which tested the validity of the instrument on four groups of elderly people differing in health status. The results showed that the profile was capable of discriminating between groups differing in terms of diagnosed chronic illness, number of consultations at primary care level, and physiological fitness. Age, sex, and marital status were not significant overall in affecting scores. In these elderly subjects, perceived health status accorded well with objective health status. Further tests of the profile are now taking place on younger groups of subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.34.4.281

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 9Dohrenwend BS, Dohrenwend BP. Social Status and Psychosocial Disorders. A Causal Inquiry. New York: Wiley, 1969.
  2. McDowell I, Martini CJ. Problems and new directions in primary health care. Int J Epidemiol 1976; 5: 247-50.
  3. Martini CJ, McDowell I. The evaluation of strategies for the improvement of life style: an example drawn from two locomotor disorders. Paper read at a conference of the International Epidemiological Association, Puerto Rico, September 1977. 285 Protected by copyright. on July 15, 2023 by guest. http://jech.bmj.com/ J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.34.4.281 on 1 December 1980. Downloaded from
  4. 1Torgerson W. Theory and Methods ofScaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.
  5. "Tissue T. Another look at self-rated health. J Gerontol 1972; 27: 91-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Backett, E. M., Williams, J., & Papp, E.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1980-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
281-286
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2166911359
Cited by
924
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
health perception, Nottingham Health Profile, instrument validation, older adults, chronic disease, primary care visits, physical fitness, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Aged, Attitude to Health, England, Female, Health Status Indicators, Health Surveys, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Methods, Middle Aged, Pain, Physical Fitness, Self Concept, Social Isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review