The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis.
Open accessAbstract
A study is described which tested the reliability of the Nottingham Health Profile, a standardised measure of perceived health status suitable for use with both large groups and individual patients. Patients with osteoarthrosis, uncomplicated by other diagnosed conditions, were given the questionnaire to fill in on two separate occasions four weeks apart. Analysis of data showed that all sections of the profile achieved a high level of reliability with coefficients of correlation ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 on part I and from 0.44 to 0.86 on part II. Patients reported many problems in the areas of physical mobility, pain, sleep, and energy, but rather fewer in the areas of social isolation and emotional reactions. With the exception of family relationships, most respondents reported a high level of disruption of their daily activities. Patients were very consistent in the number and type of problems which they affirmed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study
Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Backett, E. M., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1980) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.34.4.281 · Cited by 924
Self-citationThe development of a subjective health indicator
Hunt, S. M., & McEwen, J. (1980) · Sociology of Health and Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340686 · Cited by 442
Self-citation
Cited by
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf01593882 · Cited by 2,206
Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial
Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R. C., Twisk, J. W., Lankhorst, G. J., & Koetsier, J. C. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x · Cited by 938
Cost effective management programme for heart failure reduces hospitalisation
Cline, C. M. J., Israelsson, B. Y. A., Willenheimer, R. B., Broms, K., & Erhardt, L. R. (1998) · Heart · doi:10.1136/hrt.80.5.442 · Cited by 409
Beaton, D. E., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Bombardier, C. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00296-x · Cited by 406
The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review
Robertsson, O., Ranstam, J., Sundberg, M., W-Dahl, A., & Lidgren, L. (2014) · Bone & Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000289 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., & Williams, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 297-300
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2153135450
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.35.4.297
- The paper
- Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., & Williams, J. (1981). Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.35.4.297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
