The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study.
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--To investigate the relationship between self reported health status and sickness absence. DESIGN--Analysis of questionnaire and sickness absence data from the first phase of the Whitehall II study--a longitudinal study set up to investigate the degree and causes of the social gradient in morbidity and mortality. SETTING--London offices of 20 civil service departments. PARTICIPANTS--Altogether 6895 male and 3413 female civil servants aged 35-55 years. Analysis was conducted on 88% of participants who had complete data for the present analysis. MAIN RESULTS--A strong inverse relation between the grade of employment (measure of socioeconomic status) and sickness absence was observed. Men in the lowest grade had rates of sickness absence six times higher than those in the highest grade. For women the corresponding differences were two to five times higher. In general, the longer the duration of absence, the more strongly did baseline health predict rates of absence. However, the health measures also predicted shorter spells, although to a lesser extent. Job satisfaction was strongly related to sickness absence with higher rates in those who reported low job satisfaction. After adjusting for health status the association remained for one to two day absences, but was greatly reduced for absences longer than three days. CONCLUSION--There was a strong association between ill health and sickness absence, particularly for longer spells. The magnitude of the association may have been underestimated because of the strength of the association between grade of employment and sickness absence. It is proposed that sickness absence be used as an integrated measure of physical, psychological, and social functioning in studies of working populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study
Idler, E. L., & Angel, R. J. (1990) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.80.4.446 · Cited by 864
Cited by
Gallo, L. C., & Matthews, K. A. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.10 · Cited by 1,366
Objective and subjective socioeconomic status and susceptibility to the common cold.
Cohen, S., Alper, C. M., Doyle, W. J., Adler, N., Treanor, J. J., & Turner, R. B. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.268 · Cited by 334
Sense of coherence and health: evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples
Kivimäki, M., Feldt, T., Vahtera, J., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00326-3 · Cited by 262
Johansson, G., & Lundberg, I. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00407-6 · Cited by 255
Employee control over working times: associations with subjective health and sickness absences
Ala-Mursula, L., Vahtera, J., Kivimäki, M., Kevin, M. V., & Pentti, J. (2002) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.56.4.272 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Marmot, M., Feeney, A., Shipley, M., North, F., & Syme, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-130
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2167291107
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.