The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study.
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess the contributions of major risk factors for campylobacteriosis in New Zealand. DESIGN: Case-control study. Home interviews were conducted over nine months using a standardised questionnaire to assess recent food consumption and other exposures. SETTING: Four centres in New Zealand with high notification rates of campylobacter infections--Auckland, Hamilton, Wellington, and Christchurch. PARTICIPANTS: Case patients were 621 people notified between 1 June 1994 and 28 February 1995 as having campylobacter infection. Control subjects were selected randomly from telephone directories, and were matched 1:1 with case patients in relation to sex, age group, and home telephone prefix. RESULTS: Risk of campylobacteriosis was strongly associated with recent consumption of raw or undercooked chicken (matched odds ratio 4.52, 95% confidence interval 2.88, 7.10). There was also an increased risk with chicken eaten in restaurants (matched odds ratio 3.85; 2.52, 5.88). Recent consumption of baked or roasted chicken seemed to be protective. Campylobacteriosis was also associated with recent overseas travel, rainwater as a source of water at home, consumption of raw dairy products, and contact with puppies and cattle, particularly calves. CONCLUSIONS: Improperly cooked chicken seems to be associated with a large proportion of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand. Thorough cooking of chicken in homes and restaurants could reduce considerably the incidence of this disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CAMPYLOBACTER ENTERITIS AT A UNIVERSITY: TRANSMISSION FROM EATINGCHICKEN AND FROM CATS
DEMING, M. S., TAUXE, R. V., BLAKE, P. A., DIXON, S. E., FOWLER, B. S., JONES, T. S., LOCKAMY, E. A., PATTON, C. M., & SIKES, R. O. (1987) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114685 · Cited by 271
Cited by
Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective
Humphrey, T., O'Brien, S., & Madsen, M. (2007) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006 · Cited by 733
Friedman, C. R., Hoekstra, R. M., Samuel, M., Marcus, R., Bender, J., Shiferaw, B., Reddy, S., Desai Ahuja, S., Helfrick, D. L., Hardnett, F., et al. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/381598 · Cited by 536
Contamination of potable roof-collected rainwater in Auckland, New Zealand
Simmons, G., Hope, V., Lewis, G., Whitmore, J., & Gao, W. (2001) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00420-6 · Cited by 273
Antimicrobial Resistance among Campylobacter Strains, United States, 1997–2001
Gupta, A., Nelson, J. M., Barrett, T. J., Tauxe, R. V., Rossiter, S. P., Friedman, C. R., Joyce, K. W., Smith, K. E., Jones, T. F., Hawkins, M. A., et al. (2004) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1006.030635 · Cited by 269
DOMINGUES, A. R., PIRES, S. M., HALASA, T., & HALD, T. (2012) · Epidemiology and Infection · doi:10.1017/s0950268811002676 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Eberhart-Phillips, J., Walker, N., Garrett, N., Bell, D., Sinclair, D., Rainger, W., & Bates, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 686-691
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2029320600
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.51.6.686
- The paper
- Eberhart-Phillips, J., Walker, N., Garrett, N., Bell, D., Sinclair, D., Rainger, W., & Bates, M. (1997). Campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: results of a case-control study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.51.6.686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.