The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Urinary incontinence in middle aged women: childhood enuresis and other lifetime risk factors in a British prospective cohort.
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and lifetime risk factors for urinary incontinence in middle aged women. DESIGN: Nationally representative birth cohort study with prospective data on childhood enuresis, measured adult height and weight, childbearing histories and measures of socioeconomic status updated at regular contacts, and measures of menopausal status, symptomatology and health care in midlife. SETTING: England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: General population sample of 1333 women aged 48 years. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty per cent reported symptoms of stress incontinence and 22% reported symptoms of urge incontinence in the previous year. Eight per cent had severe symptoms. Women who at age 6 years had wet in the day or several nights a week were more likely to suffer severe incontinence and report urge symptoms but occasional bedwetting was not associated with an increased risk in adult life. Those who were older at the birth of their children and who had vaginal deliveries had an excess risk of stress symptoms. Heavier adult body weight was also a risk factor for these symptoms and for severe incontinence. Postmenopausal women were less likely to report stress symptoms. These risk factors remained significant after taking account of the increased reporting of incontinence among women with high levels of general symptomatology and general practitioner visits, and of stress symptoms among better educated women. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary incontinence is a common problem among middle aged women. This is the first prospective study of a general population sample to support the postulated link between childhood enuresis and adult incontinence. Child-bearing has long term adverse effects, particularly for older mothers. Overweight is a common risk factor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Garvey, W. T., Mechanick, J. I., Brett, E. M., Garber, A. J., Hurley, D. L., Jastreboff, A. M., Nadolsky, K., Pessah-Pollack, R., & Plodkowski, R. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161365.gl · Cited by 1,914
Urinary Incontinence after Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section
Rortveit, G., Daltveit, A. K., Hannestad, Y. S., & Hunskaar, S. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021788 · Cited by 786
Risk factors for urinary incontinence among middle-aged women
Danforth, K. N., Townsend, M. K., Lifford, K., Curhan, G. C., Resnick, N. M., & Grodstein, F. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.051 · Cited by 395
Obesity and Urinary Incontinence: Epidemiology and Clinical Research Update
Subak, L. L., Richter, H. E., & Hunskaar, S. (2009) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.071 · Cited by 351
Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study
Rortveit, G. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01566-6 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuh, D., Cardozo, L., & Hardy, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 453-458
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2110441848
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urinary incontinence in middle aged women: childhood enuresis and other lifetime risk factors in a British prospective cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.53.8.453
- The paper
- Kuh, D., Cardozo, L., & Hardy, R. (1999). Urinary incontinence in middle aged women: childhood enuresis and other lifetime risk factors in a British prospective cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.8.453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.