The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Job strain, job demands, decision latitude, and risk of coronary heart disease within the Whitehall II study
Open accessAbstract
Study objectives: To investigate the association between job strain and components of the job strain model and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Design: Prospective cohort study (Whitehall II study). At the first phase of the study (1985–1988), data on self reported psychosocial work characteristics were collected from all participants. Participants were followed up until the end of phase 5 (1997–2000), with mean length of follow up of 11 years. Setting: London based office staff in 20 civil service departments. Participants: 6895 male and 3413 female civil servants aged 35–55. Outcome measures: Incident validated CHD. Main results: People with concurrent low decision latitude and high demands (job strain) were at the highest risk for CHD. High job demands, and, less consistently, low decision latitude, predicted CHD incidence. The effect of job strain on CHD incidence was strongest among younger workers, but there was no effect modification by social support at work, or employment grade. Conclusions: Job strain, high job demands, and, to some extent, low decision latitude, are associated with an increased risk of CHD among British civil servants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Marmot, M., Bosma, H., Hemingway, H., Brunner, E., & Stansfeld, S. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04244-x · Cited by 1,291
Self-citation
Cited by
Stress and cardiovascular disease
Steptoe, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2012.45 · Cited by 1,321
Work Stress and Employee Health: A Multidisciplinary Review
Ganster, D. C., & Rosen, C. C. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313475815 · Cited by 831
Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future
Glass, T. A., & McAtee, M. J. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.044 · Cited by 821
Environmental Health Disparities: A Framework Integrating Psychosocial and Environmental Concepts
Gee, G. C., & Payne-Sturges, D. C. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7074 · Cited by 821
Cohort Profile: The Whitehall II study
Marmot, M., & Brunner, E. (2005) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyh372 · Cited by 788
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuper, H., & Marmot, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-153
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2066457446
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 65.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.