Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of Medical Student Research in the Development of Physician-Scientists

Solomon, Solomon S., Tom, Stephen C., Pichert, James, Wasserman, David, Powers, Alvin C.·2003·Journal of Investigative Medicine

Abstract

CONTEXT: A decline in the number of physician-scientists has been identified in the United States for at least two decades. Although many mechanisms have been proposed to reverse this trend, most of these have concentrated on MD/PhD programs, research in sub-specialty fellowships, and other approaches later in physician training. Few have emphasized early medical student research experiences as a contributing solution. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a medical student research experience on career choices and attitudes about biomedical research. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We jointly report 25 years of experience with National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored Medical Student Research Fellowship programs (MSRFs) at two colleges of medicine, the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and Vanderbilt University. In both programs, students work during the summer of their first or second year of medical school on a research project that is mentored by an established scientist and participate in a structured program (lectures, visiting professor). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We gathered data using pre- and postresearch fellowship questionnaires to assess (a) quality of research experiences; (b) tabulation of productivity, that is, presentations, abstracts, publications, and awards; (c) long-term tracking of former program participants; (d) comparison of residency placements by medical student researchers; and (e) comments from former program participants on the effects of their students' research experiences on career choices. RESULTS: During this time, approximately 1,000 medical students participated in the two programs. Follow-up data (for short-term evaluations, 96-132 respondents with a response rate > 82%; for long-term evaluations, 88-118 respondents with a response rate > 29-33%) strongly suggest (a) interest in an academic career increased, (b) one-third to half of former student respondents considered themselves to be in academic medicine, (c) the vast majority of students conducted additional research after their medical student research experience, and (d) a large number of students were currently doing research or had published or presented their work at scientific meetings. CONCLUSIONS: Over two decades of experience with NIH-sponsored medical student research programs at two medical schools strongly support the ability of these programs to interest medical students in research and academic careers. MSRFs should be included in strategies to reverse the decline in the number of physician-scientists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jim-51-03-17

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Solomon, S. S., Tom, S. C., Pichert, J., Wasserman, D., & Powers, A. C.
Venue
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
149-156
ISSN
  • 1081-5589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8267
OpenAlex
W2347023068
Cited by
290
References
0
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Medical Student Research in the Development of Physician-Scientists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jim-51-03-17
The paper
Solomon, S. S., Tom, S. C., Pichert, J., Wasserman, D., & Powers, A. C. (2003). Impact of Medical Student Research in the Development of Physician-Scientists. Journal of Investigative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/jim-51-03-17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.