The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Research training is essential in a modern undergraduate medical curriculum. Our evaluation aimed to (a) gauge students' awareness of research activities, (b) compare students' perceptions of their transferable and research-specific skills competencies, (c) determine students' motivation for research and (d) obtain students' personal views on doing research. METHODS: Undergraduate medical students (N = 317) completed a research skills questionnaire developed by the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Applied Undergraduate Research Skills (CETL-AURS) at Reading University. The questionnaire assessed students' transferable skills, research-specific skills (e.g., study design, data collection and data analysis), research experience and attitude and motivation towards doing research. RESULTS: The majority of students are motivated to pursue research. Graduate entrants and male students appear to be the most confident regarding their research skills competencies. Although all students recognise the role of research in medical practice, many are unaware of the medical research activities or successes within their university. Of those who report no interest in a career incorporating research, a common perception was that researchers are isolated from patients and clinical practice. DISCUSSION: Students have a narrow definition of research and what it entails. An explanation for why research competence does not align more closely with research motivation is derived from students' lack of understanding of the concept of translational research, as well as a lack of awareness of the research activity being undertaken by their teachers and mentors. We plan to address this with specific research awareness initiatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning
Christophel, D. M. (1990) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529009378813 · Cited by 922
The Clinical Investigator as an Endangered Species
Wyngaarden, J. B. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197912063012303 · Cited by 541
Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook
Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 494
Instruments for Evaluating Education in Evidence-Based Practice: A Systematic Review
Shaneyfelt, T., Baum, K. D., Bell, D., Feldstein, D., Houston, T. K., Kaatz, S., Whelan, C., & Green, M. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1116 · Cited by 427
The Physician-Scientist Career Pipeline in 2005: Build It, and They Will Come
Ley, T. J., & Rosenberg, L. E. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.11.1343 · Cited by 361
Simpson, J. G., Furnace, J., Crosby, J., Cumming, A. D., Evans, P. A., David, M. F. B., Harden, R. M., Lloyd, D., McKenzie, H., McLachlan, J. C., et al. (2002) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590220120713 · Cited by 355
A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school
Siemens, D. R., Punnen, S., Wong, J., & Kanji, N. (2010) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-4 · Cited by 339
The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered--but still beloved.
Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci119470 · Cited by 297
Impact of Medical Student Research in the Development of Physician-Scientists
Solomon, S. S., Tom, S. C., Pichert, J., Wasserman, D., & Powers, A. C. (2003) · Journal of Investigative Medicine · doi:10.1136/jim-51-03-17 · Cited by 290
Cited by
Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence
Edmunds, L. D., Ovseiko, P. V., Shepperd, S., Greenhalgh, T., Frith, P., Roberts, N. W., Pololi, L. H., & Buchan, A. M. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01091-0 · Cited by 309
Basavareddy, A., & Pallamparthy, S. (2019) · Perspectives in Clinical Research · doi:10.4103/picr.picr_1_18 · Cited by 117
Al-Shalawy, F. A.-N., & Haleem, A. (2015) · Education in Medicine Journal · doi:10.5959/eimj.v7i1.266 · Cited by 39
Kiyimba, B., Atulinda, L., Nalunkuma, R., Asasira, I., Kabunga, J., Banturaki, D., Nabyonga, A. S., Nakiganda, R., Ndyabawe, R., Nkalubo, J., et al. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03320-y · Cited by 28
Abdulrahman, S., Aboalshamat, K., Muthana, M., Sait, G., Bantan, N., Hafiz, S., Mahrous, R., & Alsuhaqi, A. (2020) · The Open Dentistry Journal · doi:10.2174/1874210602014010615 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgoyne, L. N., O'Flynn, S., & Boylan, G. B.
- Venue
- Medical Education Online
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5212
- ISSN
- 1087-2981 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172259255
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212
- The paper
- Burgoyne, L. N., O'Flynn, S., & Boylan, G. B. (2010). Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Medical Education Online. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.