Cited by 87Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic Care

The unfeasibility of requests for euthanasia in advance directives

Open access
van Delden, J J M·2004·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

In April 2002 a new law regarding euthanasia came into effect in The Netherlands. This law holds that euthanasia remains a criminal offence unless it is (1) performed by a physician who (2) acts according to six specified rules of due care and (3) reports the case to a review committee. The six rules of due care are similar to those of the previous regulation and are largely based on jurisprudence. Completely new, however, is the article concerning a competent patient who has written an advance directive requesting euthanasia under certain circumstances. The law stipulates that a physician may act according to that written request, as long as he or she fulfils all other rules of due care. The author defends the view that these requests are neither feasible nor ethically justifiable, and presents both moral and practical arguments for this, claiming that for consistency reasons one cannot act on the basis of a written statement and fulfil the other rules of due care at the same time. The author also examines a difficult case of a demented, severely depressed woman who had written a living will requesting euthanasia before she became demented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jme.2002.002857

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the debate about dementia EAS focuses on challenges in determining decisional capacity, evaluating an advance euthanasia directive's applicability, assessing unbearable suffering, and implementing the EAS procedure in advance request cases.

    “Much of the debate about dementia EAS focuses on challenges in determining decisional capacity, evaluating an advance euthanasia directive’s applicability, assessing unbearable suffering, and implementing the EAS procedure in advance request cases.(2, 11–16)”
  • Key points of debate regarding advance requests-including difficulties interpreting advance euthanasia directives, assessing unbearable suffering, and implementing the EAS procedure-are indeed problems that arise in advance request EAS.

    “It also appears that key points of debate regarding advance requests(11–16)—including difficulties interpreting advance euthanasia directives, assessing unbearable suffering, and implementing the EAS procedure—are indeed problems that arise in advance request EAS.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. van Delden JJM. Slippery slopes in flat countries. J Med Ethics 1999;25:22-4.
  2. Savalescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make decisions on behalf of their patients. J Med Ethics 1995;21:327-31.
  3. Delden www.jmedethics.com on August 11, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://jme.bmj.com/ J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.2002.002857 on 5 October 2004. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Delden, J. J. M.
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
447-451
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2116640208
Cited by
87
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
euthanasia, advance directives, living wills, euthanasia legislation, physician competence, demented patients, Dutch euthanasia law
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Empathy, Euthanasia, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Morals, Netherlands, Intractable Pain, Palliative Care, Physician-Patient Relations, Advance Directives, Mental Competency, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Personal Autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review