Cited by 175Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

‘Unbearable suffering’: a qualitative study on the perspectives of patients who request assistance in dying

Dees, Marianne K, Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra J, Dekkers, Wim J, Vissers, Kris C, van Weel, Chris·2011·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

Background: One of the objectives of medicine is to relieve patients' suffering. As a consequence, it is important to understand patients' perspectives of suffering and their ability to cope. However, there is poor insight into what determines their suffering and their ability to bear it. Purpose: To explore the constituent elements of suffering of patients who explicitly request euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and to better understand unbearable suffering from the patients' perspective. Patients and methods: A qualitative study using in-depth face-to-face interviews was conducted with 31 patients who had requested EAS. The grounded theory approach was used to analyse the data. Results: Medical, psycho-emotional, socio-environmental and existential themes contributed to suffering. Especially fatigue, pain, decline, negative feelings, loss of self, fear of future suffering, dependency, loss of autonomy, being worn out, being a burden, loneliness, loss of all that makes life worth living, hopelessness, pointlessness and being tired of living were constituent elements of unbearable suffering. Only patients with a psychiatric (co)diagnosis suffered unbearably all the time. Conclusions: Unbearable suffering is the outcome of an intensive process that originates in the symptoms of illness and/or ageing. According to patients, hopelessness is an essential element of unbearable suffering. Medical and social elements may cause suffering, but especially when accompanied by psycho-emotional and existential problems suffering will become ‘unbearable’. Personality characteristics and biographical aspects greatly influence the burden of suffering. Unbearable suffering can only be understood in the continuum of the patients' perspectives of the past, the present and expectations of the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jme.2011.045492

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dees, M. K., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J., Dekkers, W. J., Vissers, K. C., & van Weel, C.
Affiliations
Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Dees, Marianne K
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-09-24
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
727-734
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2141456213
Cited by
175
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
unbearable suffering, physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia, patient perspectives, coping with suffering, hopelessness, loss of autonomy, dependency, loneliness, existential suffering, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Stress, Psychological, Suicide, Assisted, Cost of Illness, Ethics, Clinical, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review