Cited by 81Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Legal Euthanasia in Belgium: Characteristics of All Reported Euthanasia Cases

Open access
Smets, Tinne, Bilsen, Johan, Cohen, Joachim, Rurup, Mette L., Deliens, Luc·2010·Medical Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the reported medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium since implementation of the euthanasia law. RESEARCH DESIGN: Analysis of the anonymous database of all euthanasia cases reported to the Federal Control and Evaluation Committee Euthanasia. SUBJECTS: All euthanasia cases reported by physicians for review between implementation of the euthanasia law on September 22nd, 2002 and December 31, 2007 (n = 1917). MEASURES: Frequency of reported euthanasia cases, characteristics of patients and the decision for euthanasia, drugs used in euthanasia cases, and trends in reported cases over time. RESULTS: The number of reported euthanasia cases increased every year from 0.23% of all deaths in 2002 to 0.49% in 2007. Compared with all deaths in the population, patients who died by euthanasia were more often younger (82.1% of patients who received euthanasia compared with 49.8% of all deaths were younger than 80, P < 0.001), men (52.7% vs. 49.5%, P = 0.005), cancer patients (82.5% vs. 23.5%, P < 0.001), and more often died at home (42.2% vs. 22.4%, P < 0.001). Euthanasia was most often performed with a barbiturate, sometimes in combination with neuromuscular relaxants (92.4%) and seldom with morphine (0.9%). In almost all patients, unbearable physical (95.6%) and/or psychological suffering (68%) were reported. A small minority of cases (6.6%) concerned nonterminal patients, mainly suffering from neuromuscular diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of reported euthanasia cases has increased every year since legalization. Euthanasia is most often chosen as a last resort at the end of life by younger patients, patients with cancer, and seldom by nonterminal patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181bd4dde

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some evidence suggests that reporting requirements and safeguarding criteria are sometimes ignored and transgressed, especially in jurisdictions where transgressions are not always prosecuted.

    “Some evidence suggests that reporting requirements and safeguarding criteria are sometimes ignored and transgressed, especially in jurisdictions where transgressions are not always prosecuted (33, 78–80).”

    From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says physicians may not always report euthanasia cases and notes possible bias in information about legal due-care criteria. It also says the Belgian committee had never sent a reported case to judicial authorities. These passages raise concerns about reporting and oversight, but do not establish that safeguards were transgressed or that known transgressions went unprosecuted. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If a physician determines that a patient requesting euthanasia meets the criteria, this must be confirmed by the assessment of a second, independent consulting physician.

    “If a physician determines that a patient requesting euthanasia meets these criteria, this must be confirmed by the assessment of a second, independent consulting physician.1 3 5”

    From Euthanasia requests, procedures and outcomes for 100 Belgian patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a retrospective, descriptive study (2015) · cites this paper as [5]

    The paper’s opening discussion of Belgian law says the physician must consult another independent physician about the serious and incurable character of the patient’s condition. It supports the requirement for an independent consultation, but does not say the second physician must confirm that the patient meets all the euthanasia criteria. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Belgium, a valid request for euthanasia must be made in writing, without coercion, by an adult or an emancipated minor who is legally competent and conscious at the time of making the request.

    “In Belgium, a valid request for euthanasia must be made in writing, without coercion, by an adult or an emancipated minor who is legally competent and conscious at the time of making the request.1 3 5 10”

    From Euthanasia requests, procedures and outcomes for 100 Belgian patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a retrospective, descriptive study (2015) · cites this paper as [5]

    The paper’s introductory discussion of Belgian law says a patient must be an adult, conscious, and legally competent when making a legitimate request. Table 3 describes requests as voluntary and written, supporting the writing and absence-of-coercion elements. Our copy does not include emancipated minors as eligible; it says the patient must be an adult. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For some studies it was difficult to determine whether the psychiatric disorder was the reason for requesting pEAS or was comorbid to another condition.

    “For other studies it was difficult to determine whether the psychiatric disorder was the reason for requesting pEAS or was comorbid to another condition (e.g., (Smets et al., 2010;Snijdewind et al., 2015)).”

    From Euthanasia and assisted suicide in psychiatric patients: A systematic review of the literature (2021) · cites this paper as Smets et al., 2010

    Table 4 and its footnote (Discussion; page unavailable) list neuropsychiatric diseases, including depression and psychosis, among reported euthanasia cases. The paper does not say whether a psychiatric disorder prompted the request or was comorbid with another condition, so the cited study supports the presence of such diagnoses but not the specific distinction the citing sentence describes. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When the patient is not expected to die in the near future, additional advice is required from a third physician, who should be a psychiatrist or medical specialist in the patient's pathology.

    “When the patient is not expected to die in the near future, additional advice is required from a third physician, who should be a psychiatrist or medical specialist in the patient's pathology.1 3 5”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smets, T., Bilsen, J., Cohen, J., Rurup, M. L., & Deliens, L.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Smets, Tinne
  • Bilsen, Johan
  • Cohen, Joachim
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2010-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
187-192
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097832199
Cited by
81
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, euthanasia legislation, Belgium, barbiturates, neuromuscular relaxants, morphine, cancer patients, end-of-life care, patient suffering, neuromuscular disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Belgium, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review