Cited by 63Genetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Isolated imprinting mutation of the DLK1/GTL2 locus associated with a clinical presentation of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14

Open access
Temple, I K, Shrubb, V, Lever, M, Bullman, H, Mackay, D J G·2007·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

The clinical phenotypes of maternal and paternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 (UPD14) are attributed to dysregulation of imprinted genes. A large candidate locus exists within 14q32, under the regulation of a paternally methylated intergenic differentially methylated region (IG-DMR). We present a patient with clinical features of maternal UPD14, including growth retardation, hypotonia, scoliosis, small hands and feet, and advanced puberty, who had loss of methylation of the IG-DMR with no evidence of maternal UPD14. This case provides support for the hypothesis that the maternal UPD14 phenotype is due to aberrant gene expression within the imprinted domain at 14q32.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmg.2007.050807

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Temple, I. K., Shrubb, V, Lever, M., Bullman, H., & Mackay, D. J. G.
Affiliations
  • Princess Anne Hospital (GB)
  • Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Temple, I K
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-06-29
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
637-640
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2098923511
Cited by
63
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Diabetes UK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
chromosome 14q32, DNA methylation loss, growth retardation, hypotonia, scoliosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Child, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14, Drosophila, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Methylation, Phenotype, Proteins, Genomic Imprinting, Microsatellite Repeats, DNA Methylation, Uniparental Disomy, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, RNA, Long Noncoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review