Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: a clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome

Open access
van Bon, B W M, Mefford, H C, Menten, B, Koolen, D A, Sharp, A J, Nillesen, W M, Innis, J W, de Ravel, T J L, Mercer, C L, Fichera, M, Stewart, H, Connell, L E, Õunap, K, Lachlan, K, Castle, B, Van der Aa, N, van Ravenswaaij, C, Nobrega, M A, Serra-Juhé, C, Simonic, I, de Leeuw, N, Pfundt, R, Bongers, E M, Baker, C, Finnemore, P, Huang, S, Maloney, V K, Crolla, J A, van Kalmthout, M, Elia, M, Vandeweyer, G, Fryns, J P, Janssens, S, Foulds, N, Reitano, S, Smith, K, Parkel, S, Loeys, B, Woods, C G, Oostra, A, Speleman, F, Pereira, A C, Kurg, A, Willatt, L, Knight, S J L, Vermeesch, J R, Romano, C, Barber, J C, Mortier, G, Pérez-Jurado, L A, Kooy, F, Brunner, H G, Eichler, E E, Kleefstra, T, de Vries, B B A·2009·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Background: Recurrent 15q13.3 microdeletions were recently identified with identical proximal (BP4) and distal (BP5) breakpoints and associated with mild to moderate mental retardation and epilepsy. Methods: To assess further the clinical implications of this novel 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome, 18 new probands with a deletion were molecularly and clinically characterised. In addition, we evaluated the characteristics of a family with a more proximal deletion between BP3 and BP4. Finally, four patients with a duplication in the BP3–BP4–BP5 region were included in this study to ascertain the clinical significance of duplications in this region. Results: The 15q13.3 microdeletion in our series was associated with a highly variable intra- and inter-familial phenotype. At least 11 of the 18 deletions identified were inherited. Moreover, 7 of 10 siblings from four different families also had this deletion: one had a mild developmental delay, four had only learning problems during childhood, but functioned well in daily life as adults, whereas the other two had no learning problems at all. In contrast to previous findings, seizures were not a common feature in our series (only 2 of 17 living probands). Three patients with deletions had cardiac defects and deletion of the KLF13 gene, located in the critical region, may contribute to these abnormalities. The limited data from the single family with the more proximal BP3–BP4 deletion suggest this deletion may have little clinical significance. Patients with duplications of the BP3–BP4–BP5 region did not share a recognisable phenotype, but psychiatric disease was noted in 2 of 4 patients. Conclusions: Overall, our findings broaden the phenotypic spectrum associated with 15q13.3 deletions and suggest that, in some individuals, deletion of 15q13.3 is not sufficient to cause disease. The existence of microdeletion syndromes, associated with an unpredictable and variable phenotypic outcome, will pose the clinician with diagnostic difficulties and challenge the commonly used paradigm in the diagnostic setting that aberrations inherited from a phenotypically normal parent are usually without clinical consequences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmg.2008.063412

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
van Bon, B. W. M., Mefford, H. C., Menten, B., Koolen, D. A., Sharp, A. J., Nillesen, W. M., Innis, J. W., de Ravel, T. J. L., Mercer, C. L., Fichera, M., Stewart, H., Connell, L. E., Õunap, K., Lachlan, K., Castle, B., Van der Aa, N., van Ravenswaaij, C., Nobrega, M. A., Serra-Juhé, C., Simonic, I., de Leeuw, N., Pfundt, R., Bongers, E. M., Baker, C., Finnemore, P., Huang, S., Maloney, V. K., Crolla, J. A., van Kalmthout, M., Elia, M., Vandeweyer, G., Fryns, J. P., Janssens, S., Foulds, N., Reitano, S., Smith, K., Parkel, S., Loeys, B., Woods, C. G., Oostra, A., Speleman, F., Pereira, A. C., Kurg, A., Willatt, L., Knight, S. J. L., Vermeesch, J. R., Romano, C., Barber, J. C., Mortier, G., Pérez-Jurado, L. A., Kooy, F., Brunner, H. G., Eichler, E. E., Kleefstra, T., & de Vries, B. B. A.
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-04-15
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
511-523
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2156922030
Cited by
358
References
9
FWCI
28.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: a clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jmg.2008.063412
The paper
van Bon, B. W. M., Mefford, H. C., Menten, B., Koolen, D. A., Sharp, A. J., Nillesen, W. M., Innis, J. W., de Ravel, T. J. L., Mercer, C. L., Fichera, M., Stewart, H., Connell, L. E., Õunap, K., Lachlan, K., Castle, B., Van der Aa, N., van Ravenswaaij, C., Nobrega, M. A., Serra-Juhé, C., . . . de Vries, B. B. A. (2009). Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: a clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome. Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2008.063412

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.