Cited by 130Retinal Development and DisordersPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchConnexins and lens biology

Mapping of a novel locus for achromatopsia (ACHM4) to 1p and identification of a germline mutation in the α subunit of cone transducin (GNAT2)

Open access
Aligianis, I A, Forshew, T, Johnson, S, Michaelides, M, Johnson, C A, Trembath, R C, Hunt, D M, Moore, A T +1 more·2002·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the molecular basis for achromatopsia using autozygosity mapping and positional candidate gene analysis. DESIGN AND METHODS: A large consanguineous Pakistani family containing six subjects with autosomal recessive complete achromatopsia was ascertained. After excluding linkage to the two known achromatopsia genes (CNGA3 and CNGB3), a genome wide linkage screen was undertaken. RESULTS: Significant linkage was detected to a 12 cM autozygous segment between markers D1S485 and D1S2881 on chromosome 1p13. Direct sequence analysis of the candidate gene GNAT2 located within this interval identified a frameshift mutation in exon 7 (c842_843insTCAG; M280fsX291) that segregated with the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The GNAT2 gene codes for cone alpha-transducin, the G protein that couples the cone pigments to cGMP-phosphodiesterase in phototransduction. Although cone alpha-transducin has a fundamental role in cone phototransduction, mutations in GNAT2 have not been described previously. Since mutations in the CNGA3 gene may cause a variety of retinal dystrophies (complete and incomplete achromatopsia and progressive cone dystrophy), GNAT2 mutations may also prove to be implicated in other forms of retinal dystrophy with cone dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmg.39.9.656

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A mouse with a naturally occurring mutation in cone photoreceptor function loss-3 (cpfl3) is being used as a model for rod monochromism, or achromatopsia, an autosomal recessive disease in which there is a loss of functional retinal cone photoreceptors, resulting in a disease that presents in infancy with horizontal nystagmus, photophobia, color blindness, and poor visual acuity.

    “A mouse with a naturally occurring mutation in cone photoreceptor function loss-3 (cpfl3) is being used a model for rod monochromism, or achromatopsia, an autosomal recessive disease in which there is a loss of functional retinal cone photoreceptors, resulting in a disease that presents in infancy with horizontal nystagmus, photophobia, color blindness, and poor visual acuity”

    From Retinal ultrastructure of murine models of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (2010) · cites this paper as Aligianis et al., 2002

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aligianis, I. A., Forshew, T., Johnson, S., Michaelides, M., Johnson, C. A., Trembath, R. C., Hunt, D. M., Moore, A. T., & Maher, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Birmingham Women's Hospital (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Maher, E R
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-09
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
656-660
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2072897672
Cited by
130
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
Keywords
achromatopsia, GNAT2, homozygosity mapping, autosomal recessive inheritance, consanguineous family, retinal dystrophy, cone phototransduction
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1, Color Vision Defects, Consanguinity, DNA, DNA Mutational Analysis, Family Health, Female, Humans, Genetic Linkage, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Pedigree, Transducin, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Germ-Line Mutation, Microsatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review