Cited by 204Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Social cognition and emotional assessment differentiates frontotemporal dementia from depression

Open access
Bertoux, Maxime, Delavest, Marine, de Souza, Leonardo Cruz, Funkiewiez, Aurélie, Lépine, Jean-Pierre, Fossati, Philippe, Dubois, Bruno, Sarazin, Marie·2012·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a neurodegenerative disease that is clinically characterised by progressive behavioural changes and social interpersonal dysfunctions. Its diagnosis remains a clinical challenge, and depression is one of the main causes of misdiagnoses due to the prevalence of apathy in bvFTD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Social Cognition and Emotional Assessment (SEA) and the mini-SEA for differentiating bvFTD from major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Scores for the SEA and mini-SEA for 37 patients with bvFTD (divided into subgroups of 17 with early bvFTD and 20 with moderate bvFTD according to the normal range of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale), 19 MDD patients and 30 control subjects were compared to define the discrimination power of these tools compared with other standard neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: SEA and mini-SEA scores were significantly lower for both the early and moderate bvFTD groups compared with control subjects and the MDD group, and very few scores overlapped between patients in the bvFTD subgroups and patients in the MDD and control subgroups. SEA and mini-SEA scores distinguished early bvFTD from MDD with sensitivity and specificity rates above 94%. CONCLUSION: Unlike standard executive neuropsychological tests, SEA and the mini-SEA can differentiate MDD from bvFTD in the early stages of the disease. The mini-SEA is an easy tool that can be utilised in neurological or psychiatric departments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301849

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have found that emotion recognition may discriminate bvFTD from late-life depression.

    “Accordingly, several studies have found that emotion recognition may discriminate bvFTD from late-life depression (Bertoux et al. , 2012; Chiu et al. , 2018).”

    From Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020) · cites this paper as Bertoux et al. , 2012

    The table of Social Cognition and Emotional Assessment performances reports significant emotion-recognition differences between patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and those with early or moderate bvFTD (p<0.0001), supporting its potential to discriminate the groups. However, the Methods identify the comparison group as patients with MDD, not specifically late-life depression; Table 1 gives ages of 51–82 and does not establish age at depression onset. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A few approaches have shown potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in small scale studies, including systematic application of clinical scales, neuropsychiatric consultation, social cognitive batteries, CSF markers, and morphometric image processing.

    “A few approaches have shown potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in small scale studies, including the systematic application of clinical scales (Krudop et al. , 2015), neuropsychiatric consultation (Krudop et al. , 2017), social cognitive batteries (Bertoux et al. , 2012), CSF markers (Vijverberg et al. , 2017 a ), and morphometric image processing (Moller et al. , 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Piguet O, Hornberger M, Mioshi E, et al. Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, clinical staging, and management. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:162e72.
  2. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio EH, et al. Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. Acta Neuropathol 2010;119:1e4.
  3. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 1998;51:1546e54.
  4. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011;134:2456e77.
  5. Kertesz A, Nadkarni N, Davidson W, et al. The Frontal Behavioral Inventory in the differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000;6:460e8.
  6. Mendez MF, Shapira JS, McMurtray A, et al. Accuracy of the clinical evaluation for frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 2007;64:830e5.
  7. Woolley JD, Khan BK, Murthy NK, et al. The diagnostic challenge of psychiatric symptoms in neurodegenerative disease: rates of and risk factors for prior psychiatric diagnosis in patients with early neurodegenerative disease. J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72:126e33.
  8. Rahman S, Sahakian BJ, Hodges JR, et al. Specific cognitive deficits in early frontal variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain 1999;122:1469e93.
  9. Lough S, Kipps CM, Treise C, et al. Social reasoning, emotion and empathy in frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:950e8.
  10. Torralva T, Kipps CM, Hodges JR, et al. The relationship between affective decision- making and theory of mind in the frontal variant of fronto-temporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2007;45:342e9.
  11. Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, et al. A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2009;132:1299e309.
  12. Adenzato M, Cavallo M, Enrici I. Theory of mind ability in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: an analysis of the neural, cognitive, and social levels. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:2e12.
  13. Funkiewiez A, Bertoux M, de Souza LC, et al. The SEA (social cognition and emotional assessment): a clinical neuropsychological tool for early diagnosis of frontal variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropsychology 2012;26:81e90.
  14. Miller BL, Cummings JL, Villanueva-Meyer J, et al. Frontal lobe degeneration: clinical, neuropsychological, and SPECT characteristics. Neurology 1991;41:1374e82.
  15. Braaten AJ, Parsons TD, McCue R, et al. Neurocognitive differential diagnosis of dementing diseases: Alzheimer's dementia, vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, and major depressive disorder. Int J Neurosci 2006;116:1271e93.
  16. Elderkin-Thompson V, Boone KB, Hwang S, et al. Neurocognitive profiles in elderly patients with frontotemporal degeneration or major depressive disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:753e71.
  17. McKhann GM, Albert MS, Grossman M, et al; Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick's Disease. Clinical and pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia: report of the Work Group on Frontotemporal Dementia and Pick's Disease. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1803e9.
  18. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, et al. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 2000;55:1621e6.
  19. Pasquier F. Early diagnosis of dementia: neuropsychology. J Neurol 1999;246:6e15.
  20. Rascovsky K, Salmon DP, Hansen LA, et al. Distinct cognitive profiles and rates of decline on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2008;14:373e83.
  21. Stone VE, Baron-Cohen S, Knight RT. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. J Cogn Neurosci 1998;10:640e56.
  22. Starkstein SE, Mayberg HS, Preziosi TJ, et al. Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson's disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992;4:134e9.
  23. Le Ber I, Guedj E, Gabelle A, et al. Demographic, neurological and behavioural characteristics and brain perfusion SPECT in frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2006;129:3051e65.
  24. Chow TW, Binns MA, Cummings JL, et al. Apathy symptom profile and behavioral associations in frontotemporal dementia vs dementia of Alzheimer type. Arch Neurol 2009;66:888e93.
  25. Fossati P, Ergis AM, Allilaire JF. Problem-solving abilities in unipolar depressed patients: comparison of performance on the modified version of the Wisconsin and the California sorting tests. Psychiatry Res 2001;104:145e56.
  26. Elderkin-Thompson V, Mintz J, Haroon E, et al. Executive dysfunction and memory in older patients with major and minor depression. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007;22:261e70.
  27. Weiland-Fiedler P, Erickson K, Waldeck T, et al. Evidence for continuing neuropsychological impairments in depression. J Affect Disord 2004;82:253e8.
  28. Fossati P, Harvey PO, Le Bastard G, et al. Verbal memory performance of patients with a first depressive episode and patients with unipolar and bipolar recurrent depression. J Psychiatr Res 2004;38:137e44.
  29. Fossati P, Guillaume le B, Ergis AM, et al. Qualitative analysis of verbal fluency in depression. Psychiatry Res 2003;117:17e24.
  30. Gregory CA, Serra-Mestres J, Hodges JR. Early diagnosis of the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia: how sensitive are standard neuroimaging and neuropsychologic tests? Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1999;12:128e35.
  31. Perry RJ, Graham A, Williams G, et al. Patterns of frontal lobe atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: a volumetric MRI study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2006;22:278e87.
  32. Monkul ES, Silva LA, Narayana S, et al. Abnormal resting state corticolimbic blood flow in depressed unmedicated patients with major depression: a (15) O-H(2) O PET study. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:272e9.
  33. Zamboni G, Huey ED, Krueger F, et al. Apathy and disinhibition in frontotemporal dementia: insights into their neural correlates. Neurology 2008;71:736e42.
  34. Heberlein AS, Padon AA, Gillihan SJ, et al. Ventromedial frontal lobe plays a critical role in facial emotion recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20:721e33. PAGE fraction trail=5.75

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertoux, M., Delavest, M., de Souza, L. C., Funkiewiez, A., Lépine, J.-P., Fossati, P., Dubois, B., & Sarazin, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Fondation FondaMental (FR)
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
Corresponding author
Bertoux, Maxime
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-01-29
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
411-416
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2104550791
Cited by
204
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, major depressive disorder, differential diagnosis, apathy, social cognition, emotional assessment, early diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Assessment, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Behavior, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review