Cited by 98Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNutrition and Health in AgingAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

Prognostic value of weight loss in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study

Open access
Janse van Mantgem, Mark R, van Eijk, Ruben P A, van der Burgh, Hannelore K, Tan, Harold H G, Westeneng, Henk-Jan, van Es, Michael A, Veldink, Jan H, van den Berg, Leonard H·2020·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence and prognostic value of weight loss (WL) prior to diagnosis in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with ALS between 2010 and 2018 in a population-based setting. At diagnosis, detailed information was obtained regarding the patient’s disease characteristics, anthropological changes, ALS-related genotypes and cognitive functioning. Complete survival data were obtained. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between WL and the risk of death during follow-up. Results: The data set comprised 2420 patients of whom 67.5% reported WL at diagnosis. WL occurred in 71.8% of the bulbar-onset and in 64.2% of the spinal-onset patients; the mean loss of body weight was 6.9% (95% CI 6.8 to 6.9) and 5.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 5.6), respectively (p<0.001). WL occurred in 35.1% of the patients without any symptom of dysphagia. WL is a strong independent predictor of survival, with a dose response relationship between the amount of WL and the risk of death: the risk of death during follow-up increased by 23% for every 10% increase in WL relative to body weight (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.51, p<0.001). Conclusions: This population-based study shows that two-thirds of the patients with ALS have WL at diagnosis, which also occurs independent of dysphagia, and is related to survival. Our results suggest that WL is a multifactorial process that may differ from patient to patient. Gaining further insight in its underlying factors could prove essential for future therapeutic measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2020-322909

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janse van Mantgem, M. R., van Eijk, R. P. A., van der Burgh, H. K., Tan, H. H. G., Westeneng, H.-J., van Es, M. A., Veldink, J. H., & van den Berg, L. H.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-06-23
Volume
91
Issue
8
Pages
867-875
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W3036383543
Cited by
98
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
the Netherlands ALS Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, weight loss, prognostic factors, survival, bulbar-onset ALS, spinal-onset ALS, dysphagia, mortality risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Body Weight, Female, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Weight Loss, Prevalence, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review