Cited by 39Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Early symptoms in symptomatic and preclinical genetic frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Open access
Tavares, Tamara Paulo, Mitchell, Derek G V, Coleman, Kristy KL, Coleman, Brenda L, Shoesmith, Christen L, Butler, Christopher R, Santana, Isabel, Danek, Adrian +23 more·2020·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: The clinical heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) complicates identification of biomarkers for clinical trials that may be sensitive during the prediagnostic stage. It is not known whether cognitive or behavioural changes during the preclinical period are predictive of genetic status or conversion to clinical FTD. The first objective was to evaluate the most frequent initial symptoms in patients with genetic FTD. The second objective was to evaluate whether preclinical mutation carriers demonstrate unique FTD-related symptoms relative to familial mutation non-carriers. Methods: The current study used data from the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative multicentre cohort study collected between 2012 and 2018. Participants included symptomatic carriers (n=185) of a pathogenic mutation in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), progranulin (GRN) or microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) and their first-degree biological family members (n=588). Symptom endorsement was documented using informant and clinician-rated scales. Results: The most frequently endorsed initial symptoms among symptomatic patients were apathy (23%), disinhibition (18%), memory impairments (12%), decreased fluency (8%) and impaired articulation (5%). Predominant first symptoms were usually discordant between family members. Relative to biologically related non-carriers, preclinical MAPT carriers endorsed worse mood and sleep symptoms, and C9orf72 carriers endorsed marginally greater abnormal behaviours. Preclinical GRN carriers endorsed less mood symptoms compared with non-carriers, and worse everyday skills. Conclusion: Preclinical mutation carriers exhibited neuropsychiatric symptoms compared with non-carriers that may be considered as future clinical trial outcomes. Given the heterogeneity in symptoms, the detection of clinical transition to symptomatic FTD may be best captured by composite indices integrating the most common initial symptoms for each genetic group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2020-322987

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavares, T. P., Mitchell, D. G. V., Coleman, K. K., Coleman, B. L., Shoesmith, C. L., Butler, C. R., Santana, I., Danek, A., Gerhard, A., de Mendonca, A., Borroni, B., Tartaglia, M. C., Graff, C., Galimberti, D., Tagliavini, F., Moreno, F., Frisoni, G. B., Rowe, J. B., Levin, J., Van Swieten, J. C., Otto, M., Synofzik, M., Sanchez-Valle, R., Vandenberghe, R., Laforce, R. J., Ghidoni, R., Sorbi, S., Ducharme, S., Masellis, M., Rohrer, J. D., & Finger, E.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • St Joseph's Health Care (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
  • Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli (IT)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Finger, Elizabeth
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-08-07
Volume
91
Issue
9
Pages
975-984
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W3047873932
Cited by
39
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • UK Medical Research Council
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research operating grant (MOP 327387)
  • The Bluefield Project
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  • Weston Brain Institute
  • Swedish Brain Foundation
  • StratNeuro, Swedish Demensfonden
  • JPND Prefrontals Swedish Research Council (529-2014-7504)
  • MRC Clinician Scientist Fellowship (MR/M008525/1)
  • NIHR Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Unit, the NIHR UCL/H Biomedical Research Centre and the Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre (LWENC) Clinical Research Facility
  • Swedish Research Council (2015- 02926, 2018-02754)
  • MRC UK GENFI grant (MR/ M023664/1)
  • NIHR Rare Disease Translational Research Collaboration (BRC149/NS/MH)
  • The Italian Ministry of Health (NET-2011-02346784)
  • Alzheimer’s Society PhD Studentship (AS-PhD-2015- 005)
  • the Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust (103848)
  • The Canadian Institutes of Health Research as part of a Centres of Excellence in Neurodegeneration grant
  • Association for frontotemporal Dementias Research Grant 2009, ZonMw Memorabel project (733050103 and 733050813)
  • Karolinska Institutet Doctoral Funding
  • Stockholm County Council ALF
  • Swedish Alzheimer Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, frontotemporal dementia, C9orf72, progranulin, MAPT, early symptoms, neuropsychiatric symptoms, apathy, disinhibition, family members, biomarkers, symptom heterogeneity
MeSH terms
C9orf72 Protein, Progranulins, Adult, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, tau Proteins, Frontotemporal Dementia, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review