CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 336Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cannabinoids in multiple sclerosis (CAMS) study: safety and efficacy data for 12 months follow up

Open access
Zajicek, J P·2005·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
DOI 10.1136/jnnp.2005.070136PMC PMC1739436
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness and long term safety of cannabinoids in multiple sclerosis (MS), in a follow up to the main Cannabinoids in Multiple Sclerosis (CAMS) study. METHODS: In total, 630 patients with stable MS with muscle spasticity from 33 UK centres were randomised to receive oral Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC), cannabis extract, or placebo in the main 15 week CAMS study. The primary outcome was change in the Ashworth spasticity scale. Secondary outcomes were the Rivermead Mobility Index, timed 10 metre walk, UK Neurological Disability Score, postal Barthel Index, General Health Questionnaire-30, and a series of nine category rating scales. Following the main study, patients were invited to continue medication, double blinded, for up to 12 months in the follow up study reported here. RESULTS: Intention to treat analysis of data from the 80% of patients followed up for 12 months showed evidence of a small treatment effect on muscle spasticity as measured by change in Ashworth score from baseline to 12 months (Delta(9)-THC mean reduction 1.82 (n = 154, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 3.12), cannabis extract 0.10 (n = 172, 95% CI -0.99 to 1.19), placebo -0.23 (n = 176, 95% CI -1.41 to 0.94); p = 0.04 unadjusted for ambulatory status and centre, p = 0.01 adjusted). There was suggestive evidence for treatment effects of Delta(9)-THC on some aspects of disability. There were no major safety concerns. Overall, patients felt that these drugs were helpful in treating their disease. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide limited evidence for a longer term treatment effect of cannabinoids. A long term placebo controlled study is now needed to establish whether cannabinoids may have a role beyond symptom amelioration in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.2005.070136

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hampson AJ, Grimaldi M, Axelrod J, et al. Cannabidiol and (-)delta9- tetrahydrocannabinol are neuroprotective antioxidants. Proc Natl Acad Sci SA 1998;95:8268-73.
  2. Riazi A, Fox P, Vickery J, et al. Developing a patient-based measure of the impact of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 2003;9:S151.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–336 of 336

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zajicek, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Zajicek, J P
ORCID
Zajicek, J P
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
76
Issue
12
Pages
1664-1669
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/jnnp.2005.070136
PMC
PMC1739436
OpenAlex
W2031114852
Cited by
335
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
FWCI
14.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, cannabinoids, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabis extracts, spasticity, long-term safety, disability, mobility (physical function), spasticity management
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Cannabis, Double-Blind Method, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Placebos, Plant Extracts, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review