Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Core Text of Neuroanatomy

Open access
Graham, J. G.·1978·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

This is a very unusual book being part autobiographical, part scientific, part philosophical, and even at times meta- physical.James Austin is a distinguished neurologist whose work on the identification of sulphatides, at first in the neurones and later in the urine of patients with metachromatic leucodys- trophy, and also the inherited metabolic deficiency in Krabbe's globoid cell leucodystrophy, is well known.It is the description of how this work came about that is so interesting, particularly to the reviewer who must have been present at the meeting when Denny Brown had an argument with Joe Foley which started the young Austin on a train of thought and study which eventually led him into this complex field of research.I cannot have had the same perception because I do not remember this occasion particularly among many similar interesting exchanges at that time.However, the discussion started off for the author what is the whole theme of the bookserendipity.This word, little used in England before a recent very popular radio programme, can be defined in many ways, but applied to research it consists of taking full advantage of chance happenings to further the pro- gress of knowledge.Pasteur said that fortune favoured the prepared mind, and this remark is often applied to Fleming's discovery of penicillin.Austin also considers that chance is important in research discoveries but only if the mind is well disciplined to appreciate the vital nature of that chance event, and prepared to apply the chance to the creation of a new idea or approach.It is a book very easy to read, even in bed at night, with short chapters which leave you waiting with interest for the next, and there is constant reference to people whom one has known well.That it is of wider interest than just to the doctor is shown by the fact that extracts have appeared in other than the medical press.The book is recommended to the clinician and research worker, and to the non-medical reader who wonders how the research worker works.It is a sort of halfway house between inspi- rational leaping out of the bath shouting Eureka, and the painstaking burning of the midnight oil, but always punctuated by taking advantage of the apple oc- casionally falling on one's head.It will shatter some illusions, but illuminate many others.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.41.12.1147-b

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Graham, J. G.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1978-12-01
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
1147-1147
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105481037
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Core Text of Neuroanatomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.41.12.1147-b
The paper
Graham, J. G. (1978). Core Text of Neuroanatomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.41.12.1147-b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.